User talk:PrussianOwl/Archive 1

This is the talk page of Jjjjjjdddddd

Copy-editing of Kill the Irishman
Thanks for your copy-editing of the article. I have read through the article and think it's great!. You've really helped me to clean the article up. Thanks again!. All the best!

- Metal121 (talk), 21:45, July 19, 2015 (GMT)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:35, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Wikipedia Article


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (e • t • c) 15:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Signature and AfC
Hi, Something is wrong with your signature: at Talk:Devonshire Sound Studios it goes to a non-existent user. Also, I see that you have only a few hundred edits for the moment. While I appreciate your willingness to help, accepting Devonshire Sound Studios suggests that you should perhaps first get more experience yourself before trying to help out other users. Happy editing! --Randykitty (talk) 15:49, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I second that remark. Accepting Elicited Personal Information Retrieval was, to put it mildly, very dubious. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:05, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

CVUA
Jjjjjjdddddd, I've added you as my student. This is your CVUA page. I will regularly assign more work as you complete what I've already assigned. If you plan on being away from editing for a week or more, please let me know. I prefer to see assignments completed in a few days. I also notice you've been using Page Curation and have installed Igloo. We're not using any tools to start, so be sure to discontinue use for CVUA work. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 20:28, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * You've been gone for two weeks. You never completed the first assignment. I specifically asked that you let me know if you'd be gone from Wikipedia so I can only assume something changed with you. For that reason, I'm terminating our arrangement. Should you return you'll have to reapply for a trainer. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 22:59, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews
Hello. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular. The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered. If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.) If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with. Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors. I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC). Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Counter-Vandalism
Hello, I was wondering if you could train me. I saw your name in the trainers list. Hope to hear from you soon! Snowycats (talk) 01:11, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Jjjjjjdddddd is not an instructor, they're a student and has been gone from Wikipedia for awhile. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 03:07, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Declined speedy?
I noticed you declined the Loose Hands speedy deletion request. You didn't post a reason. Shall we repost the speedy tag now that the reference proposed by the author suggests even more that it is made up by the editor? I think AfD discussion will waste time needed for genuinely borderline articles. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 09:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Repost of Online Film & Television Association
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. WikiHannibal (talk) 18:36, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Your edit to Rocks Village Bridge
Hello. I noticed that you had added a tag to the page Rocks Village Bridge, which I created about notability. However, that message basically says the same thing as the unreferenced tag, which is already there. Because of this, I have removed it. Please refrain from adding extra tags to articles in the future as it just creates "clutter". Thanks. ChecKemzV (talk) 20:21, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Kill the Irishman
Thanks very much for copyediting this GOCE request. When you're done, the Done tag is sufficient; no need to strike through the whole request. Have fun and all the best,  Mini  apolis  23:18, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Meetup to revitalize & prioritize WikiProject Seattle

 * Yours,


 * To unsubscribe from future messages from Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list. -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:35, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Quit adding the tags
There is a number of different editors removing your tags. These are people who have been editing tennis articles for a while now.

Please stop adding them back. The consensus here seems pretty clear to me, even if you don't like it.

Rubyaxles (talk) 19:55, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Cecilio Acosta
What is the idea of putting templates in less than 9 minutes after the upload? I'm using the translate extension, trying (as fast as I can) to solve the errors, regards --Oscar (talk) 22:39, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, just to let you know I'm going to remove the maintenance tags since the article has been updated in the past month and IMHO there no more errors regarding syntax. --Oscar (talk) 17:33, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

New Page Patrol
Hi. We appreciate your enthusiasm but with only 233 edits to articles it is most unlikely that you have sufficient experience to be patrolling new pages. Please consider completing the course you wished to start at the WP:CVUA and when you have demonstrated your knowledge with a few hundred reverts of vandalism, you may be ready to attempt New Page Patrol. This is just a selection of some of your recent patrols that were incorrect or unhelpful:  []. If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:26, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

My edits
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:34, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Whisperback
13:14, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Whisperback
01:28, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

cgersten
Jjjjjjdddddd, did you read the article that was cited?
 * What?

Sorry - my bad, wrong person.

Not logging in
Please remember to log in when you edit. Not doing so could lead to IP edits being reverted as vandalism. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:25, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * And speaking of reverting vandalism - I saw that you sent this message saying you want to receive WP:CVUA training from him. Well, I am his student and am still waiting on him to check my vandal reverts. I wonder if he will ever deal with me further, and unless he does so soon, it's unlikely that he can deal with another trainee at the same time (wondering why he didn't update the CVUA page?). &#60;&#60;&#60; SOME GADGET GEEK &#62;&#62;&#62; (talk) 03:18, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of What's 9 + 10 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article What's 9 + 10 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/What's 9 + 10 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Savonneux (talk) 08:09, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

New Page Patrol
Please stop patrolliing articles now until you can convince us through significant counter vandalism work that you have learned a bout CSD, Deletion, and notability. Please note that this is a formal request. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:43, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Whisperback
04:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your username
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Jjjjjjdddddd", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Trammel Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", and "WidgetFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a change of username, by completing this form, that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. WP:CONF   333-blue 01:55, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Neelix
I noticed you posted on User:Neelix a message about people speedy deleting his redirects. This has nothing to do with how they are structured, and everything to do with the fact he created over 50,000 redirects, tens of thousands of which are inappropriate. A special G6 category was created just for his junk, he lost his Admin status, and is topic banned from creating redirects for a year. Legacypac (talk) 12:41, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:47, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar
Hi Jjjjjjdddddd, and thank you for the barnstar! In my RfA in answer to the question "What administrative work do you intend to take part in?", I wrote "things you won't notice." I do a lot of speedy deletion work, that's true. But what I am most proud of in that area is rescuing speedy deletion nominations for good encyclopedia articles. I haven't kept a log of those. Maybe I should have. But then again, I am quite pleased that - with the exception of your good self in this particular case - most people are quite unaware of just how low profile an admin I am. I like it that way. If you need any help and guidance whatsoever, please let me know. Thanks again! Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:08, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:PASHA Insurance
Hi. After your move, Wikipedia:PlaceholderArticles for deletion/Draft:PASHA Insurance had just a db-g6 tag on it with rationale "Moved to Miscellany for Deletion", and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draft:PASHA Insurance was a redirect to it. So I have deleted both, but I don't now see a corresponding entry in the MfD list. Do you plan to make one, or would you like me to resurrect the original AfD and list it at MfD? And have you told who originally raised it, what's going on? Regards, JohnCD (talk) 13:36, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * PS: now I do see it at MfD, panic over. Sorry... JohnCD (talk) 13:37, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited What are those, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

RfC for page patroller qualifications
Following up from the consensus reached here, the community will now establish the user right criteria. You may wish to participate in this discussion. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:01, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of What are those for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article What are those is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/What are those until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:02, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * 1) Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
 * 2) Editor-focused central editing dashboard
 * 3) "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
 * 4) Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
 * 5) Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded User wikipedia/RC Patrol (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Please join us for our Cascadia Wikimedians annual meeting, Saturday, December 17, 2pm
20:46, 15 December 2016 (UTC) To unsubscribe from future messages from Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list.

Extended confirmed protection policy RfC
You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob 13 Talk 16:13, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of FIRST Velocity Vortex
Hello Jjjjjjdddddd,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged FIRST Velocity Vortex for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Mabalu (talk) 11:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

SuggestBot suggestions
Hi, I removed a couple of SuggestBot templates requesting suggestions. There had been too many edits to this talk page after them being added for SuggestBot to find, so it ignores them. Feel free to add one again whenever you need suggestions, and thanks for using SuggestBot! Cheers, Nettrom (talk) 15:36, 4 June 2017 (UTC)