User talk:Pscottc

A tag has been placed on Earl Kelly requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Lcarscad (talk) 05:05, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Deleted again -- please see Wikipedia is not a memorial site. NawlinWiki (talk) 05:14, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Earl R. Kelly Jr.
A tag has been placed on Earl R. Kelly Jr. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. faithless  (speak)  10:21, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

December 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. faithless  (speak)  10:22, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Your edits to Ballard High School
Please stop inserting statements about Earl Kelly into this article. If you continue to do so you will be reported to AIV. You've been warned several times before about creating articles for this person because they fail Wikipedia's notability requirements. This will serve as your final warning.

In addition, please read WP:CITE for information on how to correctly cite sources. Any improperly formatted citations will be removed along with their statements.

Last, do not sign the additions you make to articles because this makes the article illegible. Thanks. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 10:32, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Per your threats over "first amendment rights," you may want to give WP:LEGAL a read. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 06:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * And the "documentable perception comment" would contradict Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Also, please respond on my talk page from now on so you don't needlessly involve third parties. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 06:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)