User talk:Pseaton/sandbox

Well-researched, well-formatted, well-written. Good job all around. Roverzorz (talk) 19:54, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

This was an interesting article. Very informative about someone in history that isn't recognized like most. What made you write this article on William Manning? Christasia Wilson (talk) 04:34, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Honestly, Christasia, I had never heard of the man before and wanted to know more. I'd heard of his theory, "the Few and the Many," but not of him, so I figured I'd investigate. Thanks! Pseaton (talk) 00:36, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

This article was obviously well researched and helped me understand Manning and why he wrote what he wrote. I don't have much as far as constructive criticism. Good job! Maweeky (talk) 12:59, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

I thought that this article gave a well rounded protrayal of William Manning. You've covered several aspects of his life and legacy and the information was well constructed and organized. I enjoyed reading it! Chlouie793 (talk) 16:35, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

This was a very good wikipedia page,I like the fact you used key events to tell the whole story. Within those events you gave very good and precise details ("SosaGodfrey (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2011 (UTC)")

Like what everyone else said, this was well-researched and laid out. The only thing I wondered was exactly how Jay's treaty was against the many. That's the only thing that wasn't spelled out directly, but I did get the main point. I had also never heard of him before and now I'm going to look up some of his writings. 155.247.166.29 (talk) 08:54, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice! I have since added why Manning felt Jay's Treaty violated the rights for the Many in the "Budding Philosophy: The Few and the Many" section. I'm glad you pointed that out. Pseaton (talk) 05:16, 4 December 2011 (UTC)