User talk:PseudoOne/Archives2008/March

Ridirect
Greetings, the page had already been redirected, but user Vegard is undoing it. The page was a disarm, and was agreed apoin by admin User:Garzo, yet this user refuse to redirect. Chaldean (talk) 00:16, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I am waiting for you to undo your edit. Chaldean (talk) 00:18, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. Thanks for telling me, I am still learning.  Pseudo  One  00:20, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Please take a further look at the users edits. He is going on a vandal rampage (for a while now), and I can't seem to stop him. I have also suspected him of being a sockpuppet (and have reported him), but I need admin help to stop him. Chaldean (talk) 00:24, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia should not be based on what you think. Wikipedia is based on real facts. The real facts is that Syriac(aramaic) people are not assyrians. Therefor should there be an article about the syriac people VegardNorman (talk) 00:26, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * You'll have to talk to Chaldean. I am not sure what to do anymore and am confused as per this topic.  Pseudo  One  00:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Can i speak to an admin? VegardNorman (talk) 00:29, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Of course, you are welcome to do so.  Pseudo One  00:30, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Cloak Request
I confirm that my freenode nick is PseudoOne  Pseudo One  04:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Revert
Hello, if you carefully look at the log I FIXED the Hhahaha this is fun and reverted Greenhouse back to original. You then reverted it back to hahaha this is fun. The perp is Islander, not me. thanks Golgofrinchian (talk) 23:56, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * No, if you look closely at this diff, you can see that you probably made an error and reverted ClueBot's edit, which I reverted back to. Thanks.  Pseudo  One  00:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry I think we were stepping on each others toes. Its a new tool to me and I was just trying to help... all apologies Golgofrinchian (talk) 00:02, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Also confuses me because you seem to have quite a few warnings on your talk page.  Pseudo One  00:03, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * That is why I got confused, and thanks Golgofrinchian, but I don't appreciate the little reference to my being the perpetrator - check out your facts before accusing people. Cluebot had happily reverted the vandalism before you stormed in with your tool. Please learn how to use it properly before using it again. Talk Islander 00:05, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Those warnings were from you two. Sorry for the perp comment I was thinking you had it out for me being you also deleted one of my articles when the original speedy poster and I were discussing it. Its difficult to be a good editor here when there are so many trigger happy admins. If I blatently post something inflammatory then I feel I am fair game for retributrion. On the other hand I am just trying to write helpful articles and most of the time before I even finish them they are instantly deleted. It causes me to be jaded and quick to anger, which I am working on. Once again I appologize for the tool error. I think I figured out what I did wrong and shouldnt cause an issue again.Golgofrinchian (talk) 00:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * (sorry to PseudoOne for temporarily taking over your talk page...) It is for that very reason that I suggested you develop the article in your own userspace first; get it perfect, and then copy it over to the mainspace. If you've done it properly, it won't be deleted. Having said that, some topics just aren't notable, and this could be one of them. We'll see how the AfD goes, and take it from there. Talk Islander 00:32, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Your actions
Hi would you mind explaining why you reverted me, im the only person who works on the page, im removing info that it already in other pages, is unsourced or has long standing pov tags. Realist2 (talk) 22:28, 12 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi, I just realized that, and reverted my edit. Thanks :) .  -- Pseudo  One  22:30, 12 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Sure ok, nice message you left on my page, ive never seen that before lol. Realist2 (talk) 22:34, 12 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Looking at this here i was wondering if you could put those columns side by side like the discography is. It makes it easier to scrowl down and gives the illusion its a shorter article. Realist2 (talk) 22:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanx that great. Realist2 (talk) 23:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

AWB
Hi, I'm afraid that I have declined your application to use autowikibrowser. This is a very powerful tool that could cause havok in inexperienced hands. For this reason there is a rule that you must have 500 edits to mainspace before you can be considered for the tool. Please feel free to reapply when you have reached this milestone. Spartaz Humbug! 10:07, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Stephen ruse
A tag has been placed on Stephen ruse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 20:23, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh hi, I actually tagged the article admist while it was being deleted. Sorry for the confusion. PseudoOne (talk • contribs • count) 20:26, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Your script tagged it after an admin had speedy deleted it. Your script actually recreated the article with just the tag and listed you as the creator. That's why Twinkle sent you the notice. Redfarmer (talk) 20:31, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Cheers
For the user talkpage revert. I was finding it very hard to decide whether to let them down politely or give a simple one-worded answer of two letters to this. Thanks for making it easier :) AngelOfSadness  talk  21:09, 18 March 2008 (UTC)


 * It did sound a little creepy, didn't it? :-) PseudoOne 22:33, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes very much so considering it was the first. I mean I've gotten threatened(implied threats anyway) and attacked but a marriage proposal is possibly the creppiest one I ever got :) AngelOfSadness  talk  22:36, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * From what I understand, the user was vandalizing and when you reverted them, he reverted them back, and was reported to WP:AIV? :-) PseudoOne 22:49, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I think I reverted him(many, many times) as a dynamic IP on the same article the user account was vandalising as there was only seven minutes between the edits of the IP and the account at least that's what it looks like on the history of the article. AngelOfSadness  talk  22:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Revert
My edit of pood was within the standards of wikipedia. It provided no information about the subject matter, wasn't verifiable, and included garbage like syntax and structure. In those ways, it is exactly like every other wikipedia article I've read that reference stupid blogs and other such things. Your threat to ban me is laughable. I counter your ban by banning you from banning me, effectively immediately and in accordance with the prophesy. If you think you're helping society by trolling through this horrible reference, you should find a new, more constructive hobby, such as burning ants with a magnifying glass or littering. They're both more productive than this stupid webpage. Even the content I changed to something more in line with reality is somewhat questionable, with the laughable insertion of a stupid Russian salt eating proverb. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.3.75.179 (talk) 21:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The reason I reverted your edit was because it blanked the content, was not useful, and was contradicting, and so was not in good faith. The only reason I issued a final warning message is because you did this after a recent block of your IP address, and if any more vandalism continues, you may be blocked from editing again. Thanks. PseudoOne 21:27, 19 March 2008 (UTC)