User talk:Pshar/sandbox

Your assignment was really well thought out. A lack of references is a disturbing thing. Maybe you could update the Wikipedia page so it is better sourced? I realize that you have a list of great sources in your works cited. Do you have any in particular you would recommend for individuals interested in the topic?

Hecate&#39;s Sister (talk) 15:41, 20 November 2012 (UTC)Sam Mackie

It's impressive that you were able to provide a list of detailed corrections without comparing the article to another encyclopedia entry; you are obviously knowledgeable about the topic. Your criticisms are concrete and insightful, which would be very useful in terms of editing. One minor criticism: my own lack of knowledge on the topic made your analysis difficult to follow at times. I think it could benefit from being made a little more accessible to the layperson. Admittedly, however, I doubt this would be an issue if you were addressing your assessment directly to the editors and contributors of the original article.

Onedayinmay (talk) 15:55, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your great and detailed comments here! Libringreen (talk) 23:13, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

I agree with the two previous comments! You should look into changing the wikipedia article because it seems to be lacking on all fronts. This is also minor but the photo for the wiki article should probably be updated as well, it looks like it was done on paint. Maybe if you're going to change the wikipedia article look into adding more external links too! But i really did enjoy your work on the seigneurial system and it's clear you have a larger knowledge on the topic and should apply it on wiki.

Technicolourtriumph (talk) 09:06, 10 December 2012 (UTC)