User talk:Psilonautika

Image tagging for Image:Doublerainbow.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Doublerainbow.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:05, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Spice (drug)
I rolled back your edit again--ironically enough, wikipedia is not a reliable source for itself, so what you need to do is find something like a newspaper article or published paper, see WP:RS for details. Let me know if you have any questions. -- Nuujinn (talk) 15:46, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Still working on this article presently, thanks. You should checkout http://shakubukuspice.com Psilonautika (talk) 16:06, 18 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Sorry, that's a spam link, not a reliable source. Please keep in mind we're an encyclopedia, not a venue for advertising. -- Nuujinn (talk) 16:49, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

This is a website that is a reliable source of information regarding the Shakubuku product that I have added to the list of "other" products that are available. Thanks. Psilonautika (talk) 16:54, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shakubuku
hangon A tag has been placed on Shakubuku requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Smartse (talk) 16:48, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

The article is in fact regarding the product list of brands of herbal incense and is in the process of being typed presently. Thanks. Psilonautika (talk) 16:51, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * You need to demonstrate that it is notable though, for it to be included on wikipedia. I've deactivated the hangon you added here as it needs to be at the top of the article (which you've already done). Smartse (talk) 17:24, 18 August 2010 (UTC)