User talk:Psl85



Welcome!
Hello, Psl85, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ), or by clicking the button, this will automatically insert your signature with username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 13:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at GameCube. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. This is extremely disruptive to do a cut and paste move of this nature, especially in light of a recent Requested Move for this that failed and had a clear consensus against it. -- ferret (talk) 12:34, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * Do this again and I'll block on the spot. This isn't your first attempt at this, and your previous effort to get the redirect deleted was also reverted. -- ferret (talk) 12:38, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for notifying me. I would rather have the official name as the title rather than simply "GameCube". I'll try to NOT do it again. Psl85 talk edits 12:44, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
hi, its Daffaakbarr. I indeed did a significant change on Pitch Perfect 2. I removed the majority of the music section and moved them to their own page, which i just created, so it will be like the first film's music section. I also changed the image to match the Pitch Perfect and Pitch Perfect 3 posters displayed, since the one i newly uploaded matches them. I genuinely forgot to write an edit summary i'm so sorry. because honestly even i'm not a relatively new user, i'm still very stiff in this wikipedia world. I just simply want the page to be in the same formation as the first Pitch Perfect and maybe eventually i'll do the same with the third film's page. Daffaakbarr (talk) 18:13, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 *  Okay! Psl85 talk edits 18:37, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 *  Can I revert my edits on the article? Psl85 talk edits 18:40, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

James G. Watt
Literally nothing about it is unconstructive. 2601:249:8200:73DB:1AE:CA2:8F5D:B240 (talk) 17:42, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Are you gonna try and answer or just keep putting a bunch of fake warnings up? 2601:249:8200:73DB:1AE:CA2:8F5D:B240 (talk) 17:48, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello!, the warnings is for you vandalize articles, not fake warnings. Psl85 talk edits 17:53, 11 February 2018 (UTC)


 * 1) I am literally allowed to do whatever I want on my own talk page. 2) You are crying "vandalism" at literally the most ordinary of edits without explanation and throwing a fit. YOU need to explain. 2601:249:8200:73DB:1AE:CA2:8F5D:B240 (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I've looked at the edits the IP made, and I'm not seeing how they can be considered vandalism. If the edits don't look like they've been done with malicious intent (which is not the case here), don't revert them as vandalism, because they're not. And if you really do need to revert the good faith edits, then actually explain the reasons for it.
 * Oh, and users are allowed to remove content from their own user talk pages per WP:OWNTALK; that is, if a user is not currently blocked and they removed any messages on their talk page, don't readd them. Thank you. Sky  Warrior  18:05, 11 February 2018 (UTC)


 * , it's looks like they're going through a slew of recent edits to put up "unconstructive edit" warnings on people's pages, some of which may be equally unwarranted. 2601:249:8200:73DB:1AE:CA2:8F5D:B240 (talk) 18:10, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) I am literally allowed to do whatever I want on my own talk page. 2) You are crying "vandalism" at literally the most ordinary of edits without explanation and throwing a fit. YOU need to explain. 2601:249:8200:73DB:1AE:CA2:8F5D:B240 (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I've looked at the edits the IP made, and I'm not seeing how they can be considered vandalism. If the edits don't look like they've been done with malicious intent (which is not the case here), don't revert them as vandalism, because they're not. And if you really do need to revert the good faith edits, then actually explain the reasons for it.
 * Oh, and users are allowed to remove content from their own user talk pages per WP:OWNTALK; that is, if a user is not currently blocked and they removed any messages on their talk page, don't readd them. Thank you. Sky  Warrior  18:05, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at James G. Watt shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Psl85 talk edits 18:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay. I will not do it more, this user rapidy revert my edits. Psl85 talk edits 18:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Warning for volating 3RR
You are currently violating our strong 3RR policy and risking being blocked from editing. Psl85 talk edits 18:45, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 16:10, 12 February 2018 (UTC)


 * When a checkuser finds that you are using more than one account, posting a simple denial will achieve nothing for you. While you reconsider your request, should you choose so to do, you might also review your editing from this account, which contains a disturbingly high number of incorrect or inappropriate edits. The edits which you have made criticizing the edits of other editors are nearly all wrong; if you succeed in achieving an unblock when the sockpuppetry has been explained, take note that continuing to edit inappropriately on other editors' pages can be seen as disruptive. This is itself a blockable offence.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:01, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I will continue contribute on wikipedia, please set an block expiry or unblock me please, my edits is not disruptive? Psl85 talk edits 18:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Hello. I'll not make any more errors, but if I see a possible BLP issue or vandalism tag, I'll revert the edit and left a notice/warning on their talk page. I will not do so again.
 * If I request unblocking and it will be declined, please protect my talk page. Psl85 talk edits 20:35, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Psl85 talk edits 19:37, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Is there any behavioral evidence here? Can the technical connection be enough to claim that those two are the same person?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  18:23, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The sock was a vandal. Psl85 is a disruptive, incompetent editor. That's a behavioral connection. Psl85 would have no doubt been blocked as WP:NOTHERE if I hadn't blocked them for socking.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:41, 17 February 2018 (UTC)



1985 video games listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 1985 video games. Since you had some involvement with the 1985 video games redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:56, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Can an admin protect my talk page, because my unblock request i requested was declined? Psl85 talk edits 20:00, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Next declined unblock request may cause to your rights to edit this talk page being removed. Psl85 talk edits 20:00, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 14:01, 19 February 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 17:48, 20 February 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 08:54, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Block evasion
This user has engaged in block evasion as of April, 2018. --Yamla (talk) 13:52, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

This user has engaged in block evasion as of June, 2018; see 46.227.72.0/24. --Yamla (talk) 13:12, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

"Wood logs" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wood logs. Since you had some involvement with the Wood logs redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 00:29, 7 November 2019 (UTC)