User talk:Pstox

Electromagnetic shielding
Hi. Your edits to Electromagnetic shielding appear more to promote a particular company than to serve a legitimate purpose. This message is also a warning about the three revert rule WP:3RR -- continued reverts of an edit are discouraged. I've visited the site you linked, and it is predominately advertising. I went looking for documentation at the site that might redeem it, but I found none. I'm not opposed to providing links to commercial sites, but those sites usually have significant content. I've looked at several existing links on the Electromagnetic shielding page, and they contain tutorials, equations, and application notes. The site you linked talks about the company's skills and expertise. What do you think is redeeming about the site? You can reply on this page. Glrx (talk) 18:18, 3 September 2010 (UTC)