User talk:Psy5ive

This is not a duplicate account
We hired a third party SEO service that did not turn out well. He created poor wikipedia pages and has lied to us about the work he was doing. This account is not his or related to his. This is my own account.

Intention
I do work for the company whose article I originally edited. The problem I have is that this other user has created a page on behalf of this company using completely inaccurate information, poor grammar, misspellings, and weasel words and the results were below anyone's standards. It was basically extremely poorly written advertising for this company in a way that I do not approve and in a way that violates the community guidelines. I am not looking for advertising space on this website. The company is well established (47 years) and I feel that an article should exist with factual, unbiased information and sources, which are plentiful. If the article I published doesn't meet community standards or get a green light with the admins here, that's one thing. I ask that the article then be created by another party thereby removing any conflict of interest. What I am asking for is an honest look at the article I published after the first one was deleted. The article was deleted on the basis of this being a duplicate account and I do not feel that it was given any other consideration. I have been making anonymous edits to Wikipedia pages for spelling, grammar, and punctuation for over 15 years. I registered this account before publishing the article so it wouldn't be published anonymously and be flagged as a duplicate account or assume that it was the original user trying to resubmit content. Apparently that has backfired. With this account I wanted to see that a quality, community compliant Wikipedia page was submitted for this company and I will continue to make page edits to other articles as I find mistakes.

Original block

 * Someone else will review this request, but If you work for the company you tried to edit about, you are a paid editor. Full stop. 331dot (talk) 20:52, 3 December 2018 (UTC)i
 * Furthermore, you've admitted to violating WP:MEAT: "The problem I have is that this other user has created a page on behalf of this company" --Yamla (talk) 21:19, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay, I understand what you're saying, . I assumed that would only fall under conflict of interest, my apologies., the page that was created was full of misinformation and was advertising. If the company is to have a page on here, I want it to be factual and a real page, not the drivel that was the original article. I am relieved that the first article from Hydrozen1 was deleted. I only want to fix this. Can this block be lifted and I will put in a request for the page to be created? I am not out to sidestep any of the rules, I legitimately thought the article I published would be okay. Can it be reviewed? What's the best approach here? I will follow any suggestions anyone can give me. Thank you Psy5ive (talk) 22:19, 3 December 2018 (UTC)