User talk:Psycharpax

Welcome!


Hello, Psycharpax, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia or the Tutorial
 * Create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * How to add those all-important references
 * Simplified style guide

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, If you need help visit the Teahouse or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Sm8900 (talk) 00:26, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

-- TJMSmith (talk) 03:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jorge Haddock Acevedo has been accepted
 Jorge Haddock Acevedo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top NaN% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Jorge_Haddock_Acevedo help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! TJMSmith (talk) 03:54, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Quebradillas mayors
It'd be nice to see a source for the list of mayors. Do you happen to have a source? --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 21:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

San Ildefonso Conciliar Seminary of Puerto Rico moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, San Ildefonso Conciliar Seminary of Puerto Rico, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 02:10, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fundación Jaime Benítez Rexach


A tag has been placed on Fundación Jaime Benítez Rexach requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  DGG ( talk ) 03:07, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Kimberly Guilfoyle at the 2020 Republican National Convention for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kimberly Guilfoyle at the 2020 Republican National Convention is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kimberly Guilfoyle at the 2020 Republican National Convention until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ymblanter (talk) 07:46, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Andrew Neighbors moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Andrew Neighbors, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Fiddle  Faddle  15:15, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Neighbors (September 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrew Neighbors and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Andrew Neighbors, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Andrew_Neighbors Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Andrew_Neighbors reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:52, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:San Ildefonso Conciliar Seminary of Puerto Rico


Hello, Psycharpax. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "San Ildefonso Conciliar Seminary of Puerto Rico".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:07, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jorge Báez Pagán


The article Jorge Báez Pagán has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Losing local candidate fails WP:NPOL"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 06:57, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Andrew Neighbors
Hello, Psycharpax. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andrew Neighbors, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Andrew Neighbors


Hello, Psycharpax. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Andrew Neighbors".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! --Ferien (talk) 20:59, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Alexander Lanskoy
"recieved", "succesful", and "potrayed" are misspellings, "received", "successful", and "portrayed" are correct. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 17:56, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people considered a founder in a Humanities field, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berline. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Jay Torres for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jay Torres is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jay Torres until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... disco spinster   talk  02:57, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Jay Torres at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 03:27, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

AfD for Jay Torres
Just for information for the future... you shouldn't remove your original comment entirely from any discussion or talk page on Wikipedia, as it will seem like you are trying to hide something (I know this isn't your intention, I am not accusing you of it), and another editor may restore your original comment. If you change your mind or want to change your statement, you should just strike it out, and then write your updated comment afterward. Richard3120 (talk) 15:32, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jay Torres interview on Telemedellín Vitrina Trendy program.png
Thanks for uploading File:Jay Torres interview on Telemedellín Vitrina Trendy program.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 05:12, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jay Torres Interview on Telemedillín&#39;s Vitrina Trendy program.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Jay Torres Interview on Telemedillín&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:00, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for FBOY Island
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

"Dolores Rivera Candelaria" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Dolores Rivera Candelaria. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 10 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,Rosguill talk 22:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of last descendants of notable individuals for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of last descendants of notable individuals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of last descendants of notable individuals until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Special-T (talk) 15:08, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Hello Psycharpax. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to FBOY Island, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Psycharpax. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 14:40, 1 February 2022 (UTC)


 * This is to confirm that I have not received compensation for my edits to the Wikipedia article for FBOY Island nor any other contribution I have made on other Wikimedia sister projects. Psycharpax (talk) 17:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

"Devastated the island of Puerto Rico" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Devastated the island of Puerto Rico and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 5 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Drmies (talk) 18:33, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jay Torres
Hello, Psycharpax. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jay Torres, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Psycharpax

Thank you for creating United States Semiquincentennial Commission.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:49, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Alex Walker (politician) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex Walker (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alex Walker (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Mpen320 (talk) 00:57, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Psycharpax

Thank you for creating George Washington Museum of American History.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:21, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
 Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text  at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must: –&#8239;Joe (talk) 14:30, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
 * State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
 * Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Unblock discussion
You clearly have a conflict of interest, and you've added promotional content. On the other hand you have a DYK. One of the reasons for your block is a promotional user name, so we need to address that. . misread can you help me understand the user name issue? Is what they've said otherwise sufficient? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:35, 12 August 2022 (UTC)


 * I don't remember there being any issue with Psycharpax's username – did I say that somewhere? I don't think their unblock request above sufficiently addresses. The off-wiki evidence shows that they have been taking commissions to write articles and, ironically, the Puerto Rico-related edits were the only ones I thought weren't COI. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 12:02, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh. Misread the block notice. The template confused me thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:50, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't know why users are so reluctant to disclose their PAID status-- to the point of dissembly and evasion. PAID editing is allowed. undisclosed paid editing is not. I'll leave the request open for the sake of renewed discussion, but at this point a decline would be justified. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:57, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I thank you both, @Joe Roe and @Deepfriedokra for taking the time to protect Wikipedia from edits that go against its principles. I have never been offered nor have I ever asked for any sort of payment or remuneration for any edit I have ever committed on Wikipedia and its sister projects. I am aware, even before the block, of the requirement of disclosing paid edits. However, I cannot admit something I have not done, even if it would restore my one and only account and on which I have worked every edit of mine since April of 2020. It was never my intention to undutifully provoke a promotional stance on any edit I have published. How would I be able to prove that I have not received any compensation whatsoever from my volunteer work, except that of the satisfaction itself of contributing to Wikipedia? Psycharpax (talk) 14:47, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Your denial is simply not plausible given the nonpublic evidence. You are better off appealing to the arbitration committee if you want to continue to dispute this, but you're not going to be unblocked unless you start being honest. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 15:10, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

The Arbitration Committee has unblocked this account after a successful appeal. Izno (talk) 17:16, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Papalaya


The article Papalaya has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable, local chain of food trucks in an promotional article that cites advertisement in an attempt to establish WP:N."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Atsme 💬 📧 14:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jay Torres


Hello, Psycharpax. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jay Torres".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:13, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Commencement at the Recinto Universitario de Mayagüez


The article Commencement at the Recinto Universitario de Mayagüez has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not notable, most coverage is WP:ROUTINE or not independent."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:This is America 250.gif
Thanks for uploading File:This is America 250.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:This is America 250.gif
Thanks for uploading File:This is America 250.gif. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 04:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)