User talk:Psychology Forever

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Psychology Forever. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Jax 0677 (talk) 23:15, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Unidance
Hello, Psychology Forever

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Scope creep and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Unidance, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Unidance.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

 scope_creep Talk  18:30, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Unidance


A tag has been placed on Unidance requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Unidance. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  scope_creep Talk  22:12, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

COI
It would seem pretty clear that you have a conflict of interest on subjects related to Jonathan Kis-Lev; your edits and editing pattern promote these subjects in the usual way that editors with a conflict of interest do. Please disclose any connection to Kis-Lev you might have.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:43, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Please explain
You inserted a book as a source to support something Jonathan Kis-lev apparently said. The book is in reality self-published, but your source says it is published by "Goldsmith Press", which sounds a lot like the notable publisher "Goldsmiths Press". Care to explain?ThatMontrealIP (talk) 06:04, 5 June 2020 (UTC)