User talk:Psychologystudent79

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia! We have compiled some guidance for new healthcare editors:
 * 1) Please keep the mission of Wikipedia in mind. We provide the public with accepted knowledge, working in a community.
 * 2) We do that by finding high quality secondary sources and summarizing what they say, giving WP:WEIGHT as they do.  Please do not try to build content by synthesizing content based on primary sources.
 * 3) Please use high-quality, recent, secondary sources for medical content (see WP:MEDRS; for the difference between primary and secondary sources, see the WP:MEDDEF section.) High-quality sources include review articles (which are not the same as peer-reviewed), position statements from nationally and internationally recognized bodies (like CDC, WHO, FDA), and major medical textbooks. Lower-quality sources are typically removed. Please beware of predatory publishers – check the publishers of articles (especially open source articles) at Beall's list.
 * 4) The ordering of sections typically follows the instructions at WP:MEDMOS. The section above the table of contents is called the WP:LEAD. It summarizes the body. Do not add anything to the lead that is not in the body. Style is covered in MEDMOS as well; we avoid the word "patient" for example.
 * 5) We don't use terms like "currently", "recently," "now", or "today". See WP:RELTIME.
 * 6) More generally see WP:MEDHOW, which gives great tips for editing about health -- for example, it provides a way to format citations quickly and easily
 * 7) Citation details are important:
 * 8) *Be sure cite the PMID for journal articles and ISBN for books
 * 9) *Please include page numbers when referencing a book or long journal article, and please format citations consistently within an article.
 * 10) *Do not use URLs from your university library that have "proxy" in them: the rest of the world cannot see them.
 * 11) *Reference tags generally go after punctuation, not before; there is no preceding space.
 * 12) We use very few capital letters (see WP:MOSCAPS) and very little bolding. Only the first word of a heading is usually capitalized.
 * 13) Common terms are not usually wikilinked; nor are years, dates, or names of countries and major cities. Avoid overlinking!\
 * 14) Never copy and paste from sources; we run detection software on new edits.
 * 15) Talk to us! Wikipedia works by collaboration at articles and user talkpages.

Once again, welcome, and thank you for joining us! Please share these guidelines with other new editors.

– the WikiProject Medicine team Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 18:41, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Text
You added

"In a direct comparison, Cognitive behavioral therapy has been found to be superior to hypnotics for the long term treatment of chronic insomnia . "

The first ref does not support the text you added https://annals.org/aim/article-abstract/2301405/cognitive-behavioral-therapy-chronic-insomnia-systematic-review-meta-analysis?doi=10.7326/M14-2841

It says "Randomized, controlled trials assessing the efficacy of face-to-face, multimodal CBT-i compared with inactive comparators on overnight sleep in adults with chronic insomnia."

It did not look at medications at all...

The second source is a small RCT of 46 people looking at just zopiclone and cannot be generalized such as you have done. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:56, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your message DocJames!

This is the part I refered to, when I made may adaptions: for the the article: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Insomnia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

"The effect sizes we report are similar in magnitude to those seen in meta-analyses of hypnotics, such as benzodiazepines and “Z drugs” (98, 99), although such studies are often limited by the short duration of treatment and absence of long-term follow-up. However, unlike hypnotics, effects persist after treatment cessation (51). In a direct comparison, CBT-i has been found to be superior to hypnotics for the management of chronic insomnia, with effects sustained over 6 months of follow-up (51). In addition, although hypnotics are an effective treatment for insomnia, limitations include tolerance, adverse effects (100, 101), and rebound insomnia after discontinuation (102). Therefore, because chronic insomnia is a condition in which nearly half of patients remain symptomatic over 10 years (103) and behavioral treatments are likely to be associated with fewer adverse effects (24), CBT-i has several advantages over pharmacotherapy. Our meta-analysis shows CBT-i to be a highly effective treatment for noncomorbid chronic insomnia, producing clinically meaningful responses. Its efficacy seems to be well-maintained over time and results in significant alleviation of symptoms. This supports recommendations that CBT-i should be used as the initial intervention for chronic insomnia when possible."

I added another source that conduted a direct comparison:

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/189099

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Psychologystudent79/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Psychologystudent79/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Psychologystudent79/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Whispering&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Psychologystudent79/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Whispering ( t ) 22:42, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Sleep in bipolar disorder concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sleep in bipolar disorder, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Psychologystudent79/sandbox


Hello, Psychologystudent79. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 18:06, 2 January 2020 (UTC)