User talk:Psychron1

January 2009
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Color vision worked, and it has been automatically reverted. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here, and use this number while reporting: 775. Thank you. SoxBot III (talk | owner) 19:57, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Visual perception
Hi -- I have to say that I think the material you added is too specialized to belong in that article. How about creating a new article for it, called Color effectiveness or something like that? Please let me know your attitude -- I don't want to leave the material there for very long, but I also don't want to do anything you will see as hostile. (You can respond here, I will watch this page.) Regards, Looie496 (talk) 02:10, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

I agree that the section had to be modified, but it had some appropriate content that could benefit the page. As is, the article leaves out much of the relevant neuroscience perspective. A couple comments: some points were simply wrong: color is independent of luminance. Color-blind people are perfectly capable of recognizing objects. Further, the processing streams are largely independent. The section alluded to this by referencing independence the magno- and parvocellular pathways (although not by name). This latter point is an example of relevant contributions by this editor. --Thesoxlost (talk) 19:36, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay. If you would like to "revert my revert" and then do a clean-up of the new material, I won't object. Looie496 (talk) 20:18, 6 January 2009 (UTC)