User talk:Ptabrizi

On Talibov
Instead of giving expression to your personal bias, you might add something scholarly and useful to the article. The issue of Talibov having married a Shia women is of utmost historical significance, mentioned in all scholarly publications on Talibov (such as those that I have cited in the article). The significance lies in the fact that at the time there were two extreme schools of thought regarding the democratic process developing in Iran: one was extremely religious, and one was extremely secular. Talibov deeply believed in democracy and democratic progress in Iran, but was opposed to such extreme secularists as Akhundov (Talibov was, what one might call, a moderate). As it happened, Akhundov got his way in Turkey, where amongst others they changed the Arabic script into Roman script! The religiosity of Talibov is directly reflected in his marriage into a Shia family. Be it as it may, I find it beneath contempt that some individuals come along solely for giving expression to their strictly private preferences in encyclopaedic articles, articles that are supposed to reflect on objective historical facts, as opposed to what some may like or dislike. Why are some (and as it appears, you) constantly seeking to re-write history in the way that they like to perceive history? Is that not a sign of intellectual bankruptcy? What happened to intellectual integrity? Please, if you visit Wikipedia merely for giving expression to your personal world view, just stay away! Wikipedia articles are not social and/or political manifestos! --BF 03:59, 19 October 2009 (UTC).