User talk:Ptariche

Hi, friend
Nice work on the California Review article. One concern I have is regarding use of a professor's name in conjunction with a vandalism incident — you've gotta document this kind of stuff with footnotes if you're gonna go there, so please do if you wanna. Actually, there were no footnotes at all, which will raise the hackles of most Wikipedia sorts; you'd be advised to go back and insert a couple or a few. You also might want to break up the long section with one or two subheads to give readers' eyes a little break... That's a style matter, whatever you feel like, but in my view it could stand at least 1 and better 2 subheads in there. Nice job on the article. Carrite (talk) 06:20, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

You are cordially invited to save the world
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Capitalism Byelf2007 (talk) 15 September 2011

Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Campaign for Liberty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PIPA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:32, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of California Review


The article California Review has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:N is the major reason; possibly defunct as their website registration has expired and they are not listed as active at UCSD

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tritons Rising (talk) 02:18, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of California Review for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article California Review is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/California Review& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tritons Rising (talk) 22:06, 19 December 2016 (UTC)