User talk:Ptb011985

Sockpuppet investigation
Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
Your recent editing history at Mitragyna speciosa shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:46, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Mitragyna speciosa, you may be blocked from editing. Zefr (talk) 15:54, 11 February 2018 (UTC)


 * You have been warned also. Your recent editing constitutes edit warring. The next reversion that occurs without true talk consensus by ALL editors involved (not just your buddies), or acceptance of edits that reflect an consensus impasse, will result in a complaint and investigation.Ptb011985 (talk) 15:56, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive behaviour. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on Talk:Mitragyna speciosa, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. Zefr (talk) 16:26, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Whom am I harassing? You've been trailing my edits and comments for the last week, and doing just what I've been doing. I gave you a similar warning and you deleted it, as you have done with many other complaints about your behavior here.Ptb011985 (talk) 16:27, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Fyi, you are reported. --Zefr (talk) 17:24, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * You've been doing the same thing all the while to me; give me a break.Ptb011985 (talk) 17:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Revert again, and you will be reported again. In your zeal to mash the revert key you are also breaking the article by inserting garbage. Alexbrn (talk) 15:24, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Alexbrn (talk) 15:37, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at Mitragyna speciosa. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:45, 15 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The block wasn't just for the reversions today, it was for repeatedly reverting over time. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Again User:SarekOfVulcan and User:Jpgordon, if you're issuing a block on me, you should issue a block on the small handful of editors I mentioned (Alexbrn, Calton, Zefr), who have been doing exactly that under the false banner of consensus, and are now capitalizing on the block to overhaul the article. I'd report them but can't.Ptb011985 (talk) 18:28, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I didn't block you. I just told you what you need to do to get unblocked. And, yes, when the person who was edit warring against consensus is blocked, normal editing on the article continues. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106; &#x1D110;&#x1d107; 19:39, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * User:SarekOfVulcan User:Jpgordon There was no consensus; there was a lack of it. The editors I mentioned have been warning and reporting any users who disagree, while protecting their version. All those mentioned have repeatedly reverted upwards of 40 new edits of 5-10 different editors over the last week or so, with no consequences. In the case of Zefr I believe, I warned him of it, which he deleted from his talk page.Ptb011985 (talk) 20:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Warning
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Mitragyna speciosa. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Alexbrn (talk) 05:53, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Mitragyna speciosa. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn (talk) 16:26, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 16:30, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

You had two editors revert your addition and one other editor disagree with it on the talk page. You need to read and follow WP:BRD. --Neil N  talk to me 16:37, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 02:01, 1 March 2018 (UTC)