User talk:Pth81

Structure101
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Structure101, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.headwaysoftware.com/products/structure101/index.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:23, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Structure101
A tag has been placed on Structure101, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Structure101 and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rividian (talk) 15:25, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Structure101 for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Structure101, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Structure101 until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 04:22, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Structure 101
Since arriving here in 2008 you have done absolutely nothing but promote Structure 101. This is strongly suggestive of a conflict of interest and also considered indicative of spamming. Wikipedia is not here for you to promote your pet product, sorry about that. There are plenty of wiki-style product directories, try one of those instead. Guy (Help!) 18:29, 7 November 2011 (UTC)


 * There's a page titled List of tools for static code analysis where there are regular deletions for "non-notable" tools, with the definition of notable being that the tool must have its own wikipedia page. Structure101 and Restructure101 have both won JOLT Awards. Dr. Dobb's Journal who grant the JOLT awards is one of the most respected publications in the software industry, I find it hard to see why their judgement should be questioned. Structure101 and Restructure101 have only ever been listed on pages where they are relevant and always just with simple explanation of what they are. Pth81 (talk) 08:03, 9 November 2011 (UTC)