User talk:Pthareja

 Welcome, !

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Snozzer, one of the thousands of editors here at Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:


 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app ksmiletris.png|23px]]  The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * [[Image:Crystal package utilities.png|23px]]  How to edit a page
 * [[Image:Crystal khelpcenter.png|23px]]  Help pages
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app ktip.png|23px]]  Tutorial
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app ksokoban.png|23px|]]  How to write a great article
 * [[Image:Crystal_Clear_app_kedit.png|23px]]  Manual of Style
 * [[Image:Nuvola apps konquest.png|23px]]  Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type  here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=559846462 your edit] to Furnace may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:06, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * the household heating systems, known either as a boiler or a heater in British English, based on a central furnace. Synonyms  such as kiln, oven, incinerator,hearth predominate in
 * hearth predominate in various styles, dedicating w.r.t typical uses. Viz. burning of wastes specially hazardous wastes is known as incineration. The melting of metal is done in retorts,

July 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=563637785 your edit] to Failure analysis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:46, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * data to determine the cause of this lapse. Thus failure could be identified as a breakdown of component viz failure of a transmission gear, equipment ([[www.indianfoundry.org/docs/tech_june_

Copyright problem: GNA University
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as GNA University, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from https://www.facebook.com/pages/GNA-University-Mizoram-Students/869813876423952, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:GNA University and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, GNA University, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:GNA University. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:GNA University with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:GNA University saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Psychonaut (talk) 09:34, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Hello, I'm Psychonaut. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Advanced manufacturing because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 09:41, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of GNA University


The article GNA University has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * '''1. Suspected (but unconfirmed) copyright violations – author states that the material is taken from the website of the institution. OTRS ticket received, but inadequate. Please see discussion at Copyright problems/2015 September 6.

2. Doubtful notability – despite the name, this appears to be the in-house training school of GNA Gears, a parts manufacturer.'''

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:39, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of GNA University


A tag has been placed on GNA University requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Listed at WP:CP for more than seven days, no viable rewrite proposed, no rescuable content, assertion of permission not verifiable

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:39, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Lean manufacturing
Greetings! You made recently some edits at the article about Lean manufacturing. I'd be willing to go through your inclusions, but first I'd need some more specific page ranges for the material you have added, or intended to refer to by the material you added. I can see you have made the following additions/edits (numeration added):

"(1) Lean manufacturing or lean production is a systematic method originating in the Japanese manufacturing industry for the minimization of waste (Japanese: 無駄 muda) within a manufacturing system without sacrificing productivity, which can cause problems. Lean also takes into account waste created through overburden (Japanese: 無理 muri) and/or through unevenness in work loads (Japanese: 斑 mura). Working from the perspective of the client who consumes a product or service, "value" is any action or process that improves what a customer would be willing to pay for."

"(2)Both lean and TPS can be seen as a loosely connected set of potentially competing principles whose goal is cost reduction by the elimination of waste. These principles include: pull processing, perfect first-time quality, waste minimization, continuous improvement, flexibility, building and maintaining a long term relationship with suppliers, autonomation, load leveling and production flow and visual control. The disconnected nature of some of these principles perhaps springs from the fact that the TPS has grown pragmatically since 1948 as it responded to the problems it saw within its own production facilities. Thus what one sees today is the result of a 'need' driven learning to improve where each step has built on previous ideas and not something based upon a theoretical framework."

"(3)The role of the leaders within the organization is the fundamental element of sustaining the progress of lean thinking . Experienced kaizen members at Toyota, for example, often bring up the concepts of Senpai, Kohai, and Sensei, because they strongly feel that transferring of Toyota culture down and across Toyota can only happen when more experienced Toyota Sensei continuously coach and guide the less experienced lean champions."

"(4)Lean principles have been successfully applied to various sectors and services, such as call centers, hotel management (pizza making), healthcare etc. In them, lean's waste reduction practices have been used to reduce handling time, within and between agent variation, accent barriers, as well as attain near perfect process adherence. Additionally, the applications may promise an "all-round benefit, in an ever maturing organisation, improving business process(es) and people", and support a higher organisational brand . In the latter, several hospitals have adopted the idea of lean hospital, a concept that priorizes the patient, thus increasing the employee commitment and motivation, as well as boosting medical quality and cost effectiveness."

I think we both agree that a 18 page range for one single paragraph, or a 8 page range for one single sentence is not acceptable. Besides, in the last paragraph mentioned above, it is discussed how the "call centers and healthcare" — "the former" (call centers) and "the latter" (healthcare; hospitals) — both have different emphasis on the lean practices they take. Between "the former" and "the latter", however, you inserted a new sentence in the middle, backed up by a source talking about lean and pizzas. Although using a connector additionally in the beginning of the sentence, the material you added was not really related to lean call centers by any means. As a result, also the division between the call centers and hospitals — "the former" and "the latter", if you may  — got broken.

Anyway, as you can see, the article is far from perfect, and it's been suffering from unreferenced passages for quite a while now. Therefore, I'd be glad to review the sources you have suggested if you first specified the field range a little (i.e. a lot). This is to say, only the specific pages in question refer to the material; not every single page in the publication (just like in the academic world).

Should you be interested, please let me know. Cheers! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 15:30, 13 June 2019 (UTC)