User talk:Pthomas4

Welcome!
Hello, Pthomas4, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! King Onyx (talk) 17:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

feedback
Hi, I left some feedback for you here. Elysia (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:09, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Peer Review of XYZ Article
Add your review here....

Speedy deletion nomination of "New sandbox page for Composition Theory"
New sandbox page for Composition Theory, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is a test page. Use the sandbox for testing.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Morneo06 (talk) 15:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

New sandbox page for Composition Theory moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, New sandbox page for Composition Theory, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Zai  (💬 • 📝 • ⚡️) 15:15, 13 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Zai! Is it possible to delete this page entirely? Thank you --Pthomas4 (talk) 15:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * No problem! We cannot delete the page ourselves, but we can nominate it for deletion, which it will then be reviewed by an admin, who will delete the page if it's eligible for deletion.  Zai  (💬 • 📝 • ⚡️) 15:34, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * That's great! Thank you again!! Pthomas4 (talk) 15:35, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Written Communication


The page Written Communication has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review Liz Read! Talk! 01:26, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your note! Could you explain what "redirect from article namespace to a different namespace except..." means? I've read through the links but am a little confused. I cannot find the namespace to which the article should have been added. Or, are you referring to the fact that I moved the article (perhaps unsuccessfully) from the article namespace to my sandbox for further editing? Again, thank you for any clarification you can provide! Pthomas4 (talk) 01:36, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

June 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Literacy in the New Media Age, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Using external links in the body of the article.   scope_creep Talk  13:12, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. An edit that you recently made to WRC-TV seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mvcg66b3r (talk) 18:22, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you! I will do that! Pthomas4 (talk) 18:30, 13 October 2022 (UTC)