User talk:Ptravers23

Old ricoh
no worries then, delete it when you want. thanks It's unlike we will keep any article on a band unless it's properly sourced to demonstrate significance. See WP:MUSIC for some guidelines. Friday (talk) 15:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

For what it's worth, I looked for sources. I saw lots of self-promotion, but not a lot of proper sources. All music guide for example has never heard of them. If the major claim to fame is that they almost won a contest that might have lead to them being well-known, it's unlikely they'd meet our inclusion requirements. Friday (talk) 15:50, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Old ricoh
A tag has been placed on Old ricoh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 15:35, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

no worries, can you delete it for me then, i couldnt find how to, thanks


 * No problem. Friday (talk) 15:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)