User talk:Pttbarnum/sandbox

Katie's Peer Review
There are no official additions to the Ivan Navarro wiki page, but there are some great starting points. The article evaluation is very well done and is comprehensive of all issues with the existing article that need to be improved. Since the "Life and Work" section is lacking according to your review, I think that would be the best place to start, especially since he is a living artist and there is plenty of credible and unbiased information available on him. Since it is also noted that many of the sources are also lacking, perhaps it would be beneficial to add more information to those articles as well, based on your research. I see in the references/works cited section that you have several possible sources lined up, and it is good that you have physical text as well as web sources. As you know already, just make sure the information you glean from your sources stays fairly neutral. Great work so far! Katiewasko97 (talk) 03:50, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Christopher’s Peer Review
There is a lot of work that needs to be done to this article. Regarding the introduction, one of the biggest issues is the lack of verification. Considering Navarro is a living artist, information regarding the artist’s status and achievements will be needed as well as photographs of Navarro himself. It would also be beneficial to include an Info Box containing his date of birth, his profession, his education, and so on. In the “Life and Works” section of the article, there is very little content that can be used to hold the attention of readers. With that being said I think separating the topics of the artist’s personal life and their works will allow more room for improvements. In addition, I suggest it look up more information about the artist’s influence behind the works. Having studied Navarro’s work on my own, I know that he is heavily influenced by current events dealing with social and economic affairs. It looks like you have a good mixture of physical and web based sources listed in your edit. Keep in mind that the sources should remain neutral. Overall, really great editing and research on your end. The article needs a lot of work but working together as a group should guarantee an easy fix. Most of the basic information is there. All the article needs is to be fleshed out with verifiable sources and photographs. UwakCrow (talk) 03:20, 19 March 2019 (UTC)