User talk:Pubby

Useless Page Creation
You have every right to think and say what you believe about Wikipedia, but writing an article about it is not the way to do it. Wikipedia has a Neutral Point of View stance on everything, therefor it is not in favor of any religion, culture, or belief system, whether it be based on a god or a science. If you disagree with the neutrality of an article, you can post it in the Talk page of the Article. The page you have created is nothing more than a blog that has no encyclopedic information. Don't take a delete personally or be trying to prove a point by its deletion. Wikipedia will not delete any article you publish yourself on an online blog, etc, but Wikipedia's policies state that original research cannot be posted on the site, as it must first be published.

Thanks Charlesblack 04:42, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Do you really believe that "Wikipedia has a Neutral Point of View stance on everything"???

Respectfully, Pubby

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create such pages will be blocked from editing by administrators or banned by the arbitration committee. Thank you. ScorpO 04:36, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

I am very sorry for disobeying the many different policies that Wikipedia seems to have assembled, I was not aware of any of them. I do have a question though, how does one explain the deletion of two and a half hours of work revising to the Theory of Evolution page (just stating the arguments against evolution, not REMOVING anything)???

Respectfully, Pubby

User pages
Please do not edit the user pages of other contributors without their approval or consent. It may be seen as vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please visit the sandbox. feydey 15:39, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Your message to me
"I am also very sorry for disobeying the many different policies that Wikipedia seems to have assembled, I was not aware of any of them. I do have a question though, how does one explain the deletion of two and a half hours of work revising to the Theory of Evolution page (just stating the arguments against evolution, not REMOVING anything)??? Pubby 16:04, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

I am unable to explain the deletion of two and a half hours of work, I'm pretty certain i wasn't the one to revert it because its not in my contributions. I suggest leaving a message on that users talk page or even the discussion page of that article. ScorpO 20:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Also Wikipedia has a neutral point of view policy, if you don't believe something has a neutral point of view feel free to add an tag to the page The articles posted on the site are supposed to be neutral, any issues with neutral point of view should be fixed and the placement of a  tag helps to rectify it. Thanks! ScorpO 20:52, 8 December 2006 (UTC)