User talk:Public.pen.holder

Your username
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, " Foresee.social.media ", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. Alternatively, you can just create a new account and use that for editing. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 00:14, 9 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Would you mind responding to the above? Is your username the name of your business? -- Euryalus (talk) 04:46, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Paid editing
Hello Foresee.social.media. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Golden Bridge Welding Materials, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Foresee.social.media. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Hammersoft (talk) 01:41, 9 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I appreciate your notification. It's important to note that I am not a paid editor. However, my involvement in creating this article is indirectly connected to the subject matter I edited. My goal is to provide a fair and informative presentation of the topic in the article, ensuring that those interested in the subject have access to this information. It's worth mentioning that all the references used in the article were publicly available long before my involvement. In my latest editing efforts, I made a deliberate attempt to uphold a neutral perspective and avoid using promotional language, as per your earlier suggestion. Foresee.social.media (talk) 04:21, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
 * By the way, if my intentions conflict with the principles of this platform, please feel free to inform me and go ahead with removing my article. My initial understanding was that this platform serves an informational purpose and is accessible to the general public, provided certain rules are followed. However, the last thing I want is to jeopardize the integrity of this platform. Foresee.social.media (talk) 04:43, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I've marked the draft as relying excessively on primary sources. In fact, the ONLY references on the article are primary sources. This does nothing to establish notability. It's like saying "They're notable because they say they are notable, therefore they are notable". It doesn't work like that. Have a read through our notability guideline. If you can't find significant, independent, reliable, secondary sources that discuss the topic in detail (not just mentions), this draft will never be accepted. Yes, Wikipedia is a resource for information on more than 6 million topics. But, we are not an indiscriminate collection of information. --Hammersoft (talk) 01:39, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Golden Bridge Welding Materials
Hello, Public.pen.holder. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Golden Bridge Welding Materials, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)