User talk:Publicationaccess

Welcome!
Hello, Publicationaccess, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  21:16, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: F. Gregory Holland (February 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:F. Gregory Holland and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:F. Gregory Holland, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:F._Gregory_Holland Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:F._Gregory_Holland reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:27, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of F. Gregory Holland


A tag has been placed on F. Gregory Holland, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Warm Regards, ZI Jony  (Talk) 15:28, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: F. Gregory Holland (April 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:F. Gregory Holland and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:F. Gregory Holland, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:F._Gregory_Holland Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:F._Gregory_Holland reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:08, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Please enable edits. There is no compensatory items associated with drafting this article. The username is not associated with any group either. Perhaps we should not have been included within the recent request. Please assist. The user name is associated with an individual and not an organization. There is collaboration with others for writing and research but not for compensation. The sources listed are not intended for promotion purposes within the subject draft. Please advise further on sources. That meaning, specifically which references appear without a suitable source.Publicationaccess (talk) 18:36, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, If you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 18:10, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Please enable editing. Publicationaccess is a recent editor within the Wikipedia space. The draft article that is currently being edited is not intended for promotion purposes, but rather to provide factual data regarding the subject article. Thank you in advance for your assistance.Publicationaccess (talk) 18:48, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

The comments are appreciated. Regretfully, the views cited are presumptive. Heretofore, reasonable attempts were implemented in an effort to improve upon the draft, which apparently has now been deleted. Please advise if there is a log to perhaps refer to the deleted article for future reference. The purpose of the inquiry was to sincerely obtain assistance in improving upon the subject draft. This is disappointing. Thank you in advance for your assistance.Publicationaccess (talk) 20:08, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm truly sorry to disappoint you, but Wikipedia has certain guidelines that need to be observed. You are free to make another unblock request, one that will be reviewed by someone else, but whomever reviews it will likely have the same questions I have. It is true I am being presumptive, but it is based on the edits you have made. 331dot (talk) 20:14, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Your comment is appreciated. Please advise if the subject draft article can be retrieved and restored. The edits made are based on information obtained through public sources. At this point, I am uncertain as to where one would even view or locate the draft. Thank you so much.Publicationaccess (talk) 20:52, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Although the draft is "deleted" and not visible to the public in general, it is still visible to administrators like myself. I would be willing to email the text to you(if you have email enabled in your Preferences) if you have need of it but I regret to say it is not going to be restored as things stand now. If unblocked you would be able to request a Deletion Review, but both would require you to address the concerns given here; and you would still be bound by WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 21:21, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Your follow-up is greatly appreciated. Unfortunately, there is nothing within the preferences area. Given the outcome of these circumstances thus far, providing sensitive information such as an email address, within this space is concerning. However, I will deliberate on it. In the interim, please advise specifically the concerns that require explanation. It has only been as of today, that the edits made for the subject draft have been mentioned as a cause for concern. The last comment today prior to the delete indicated that references were not sourced. Prior to that, the education and career section needed inline citations. An attempt was made to address that. At no time was there any information to indicate that all edits made were concerning. Feel free to expand on this. Kind regards.Publicationaccess (talk) 22:26, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * You should not provide your email address here. If you click on "Preferences" located at the top right of the screen, the "user profile" screen should appear.  If you scroll down, there should be a button under "email options" that gives you the option to add an email address.  Below that should be a box that you can check marked "allow others to email me". 331dot (talk) 22:32, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If you make another unblock request, you will need to please address the reason for the block and my comments in your first unblock request. For clarity, I will list these:
 * Indicate if this account represents an organization/business
 * confirm that this account is (or will be) used exclusively by a single individual
 * propose a new username that complies with the username policy(even if it is not that of a specific organization, your current name is promotional)
 * Indicate if you represent F. Gregory Holland or anyone else, per the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy(click to review)
 * Review policy on reliable sources and specifically sourcing for Biographies of Living People
 * Indicate what edits you would make going forward and how they will be consistent with the aforementioned policies
 * I believe that covers it, though whomever reviews any request you make is free to have their own requests. 331dot (talk) 22:43, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. I have previously addressed the above items you have indicated in a prior comment. At approximately 18:36 UTC. Additionally,the original user name was a random name. No other individuals use the name. Another can be randomly be selected. Hope this helps. I will attempt another unblock request with an alternate user name. Kind regards.Publicationaccess (talk) 00:52, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

This is a courtesy follow-up regarding the status of an unblock request. Please advise. Publicationaccess (talk) 18:51, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

This comment is a repeated request. An unblock is requested. Prior and current proposed username, as well as the subject draft article are intended to be non-promotional. The user previously and going forward is the sole editor and creator. All editing will be predicated on available public sourced information non-compensatory and with no incentives. Please restore the prior draft article, so it may be potentially considered for the main article space. Inquiries and assistance will continue to be sought from Wikipedia experienced editors and administrators. Current and updated policies will be adhered to. Thank you in advance for your consideration. This is being requested through the direction of another administrator as indicated on the talk page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Publicationaccess (talk • contribs)
 * Only one open request is needed, so I removed the formatting from your most recent request. Posts should be placed at the bottom of the page as well, for proper flow.  Your request is visible to administrators and will be reviewed in due course; as administrators are volunteers, they do what they can when they can.  Please be patient. 331dot (talk) 20:17, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for that update, was not completely certain about the response process. That's very helpful. As a side note, prior editing utilizing the phrase " we" quite possibly may have been taken out of context. Understandable. Kindest regards. 21:43, 16 April 2019 (UTC)Publicationaccess (talk)

To be frank- and I apologize for it- it seems to me that you are giving general answers, trying to dance around the questions. You have not explained who "we" is in your post that I linked to above. Do you know, work for, or represent Mr. Holland, or do you work for an agency that does? If not, how did you come to write about him? What "pertinent and neutral" edits do you intend to make? Please briefly explain what exactly is meant by a "reliable source" according to policy. You need to be specific with your answers or I think most admins are going to have a tough time unblocking you. Maybe one will, as I don't speak for all of them, but I don't advise it at this time. 331dot (talk) 17:36, 17 April 2019

You state now that "there is no representation of anyone at this time"(my emphasis), while earlier you stated "No representation of another exists". Do you anticipate representing someone in the future? 331dot (talk) 14:50, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Your response is appreciated. There is no representation. Additionally, no representation of another exists or is anticipated in the future. Thank you very much. Kindest regards. Publicationaccess (talk) 20:27, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

This is just a courtesy follow-up on the prior block request, as I have responded and commented on April 21, 2019. Thank you in advance.Publicationaccess (talk) 02:28, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Have previously addressed as stated from the comment dated April 26. Please accept this appeal. Thank you in advance for your assistance.Publicationaccess (talk) 04:26, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Further unblock requests are not necessary. Your request is open and visible; there is a limited number of volunteer administrators available, and ones that have already declined your requests cannot review another.  You will have to be patient.  If you wish, you can spend time improving your request to be more persuasive. 331dot (talk) 07:54, 5 May 2019 (UTC)