User talk:Publicengagement

Neutral point of view and conflict of interest
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Sheldon Chumir. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:12, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello Publicengagement. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Sheldon Chumir, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:12, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Sheldon Chumir, you may be blocked from editing. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:23, 26 April 2011 (UTC)