User talk:Publichealthuk

August 2020
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:07, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed | 1=I am not a company or organisation, I did not use Wikipedia to post advertising. I used it to provide important public information regarding a variety of issues that have been raised in relation to public health England, prior to its covid response. I cited reputable sources, such the BBC and government websites to validate the information I posted. If there is a specific link you aren't happy about, please let me know and I will remove / replace it with one from a source you are content with. My user name is a play on public health england | decline = The kind of editing you made at the article is not acceptable at Wikipedia. First of all, the article is about the agency, not the director. Second of all, that kind of unbalanced hit job is not what Wikipedia is about. only (talk) 13:55, 19 August 2020 (UTC {{|unblock|Both the original reasons for blocking me were inaccurate and I note these appear to be acknowledged by wikipedia. You are now giving different reasons. Some of the PHE leadership are already named on here with links to their previous work. There is also reference to various public criticisms of PHE on that page. We have over 40,000 people dead in the UK and the info I posted is verified fact. What you describe as a hit job, others would describe as the precursor to legitimate questioning as to how the leadership was qualified to occupy their positions. you allowed other criticisms of PHE to be published. Mine were just more comprehensive, but all publicly available facts}}

{{|unblock|I've just read a number of other Wikipedia articles on, for example, "the soviet union". This article (on the soviet union) quite clearly talks about the leaders of the soviet union and their individual performance, so your newly invoked principle of talking about the Headline topic (PHE), not the people running it doesn't seem to be applied elsewhere in Wikipedia. As mentioned, if any of the links I published are not accurate, then I would be the first to wish them to be corrected.}}