User talk:Publicscale/Octane/Wuhudasima Peer Review

Lead
The author did not add a new lead for the updated information. I suggest the author to consider update the lead with some new information about the new ideas he added into the article.

Content
The author added lots of new content, and also adjusted some of the old content. The author firstly adjusted the isomer list, with two sub-list, "Constitutional Isomers" and "Stereoisomers", which helps the audience better understanding the concepts of isomers. However, The author added a new section named "Difference between Octane and Octane Rating", which is mainly explaining the concept of "Octane Rating". This concept is not so relevent to Octane. Octane rating is a concept specificlly is the field of fuel, and these two concept is not very related. The new content should appears in the article named "Octane Rating" instead of this one. If it needs to be in this article, it should be like a "fun fact", instead of a 300 words detailed explaination. Although this new section is not relevent to the topic, the author did very good in explaining the content and all the information is up-to-date. The author gave examples to help the audience to understand the misunderstandiing between Octane and Octane rating. Furthermore, the author added a new section name "Production and Use", but there is no content under this section. If this section is unfinished, the author should leave a note in the history.

Tone and Balance
The content added is neutral, there is no claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position, and the view point is also not overrepresented. The author is not attempting to persuade the reader.

Sources and References
All new contents are backed up by a source, and the content reflects what the cited sources say. Two of the sources are bit of old, but the knowledge is up-to-date. The sources are written by different authors, from different websites. All the links works well.

Organization
The contents are clear and consise, there are nearly no jargons in the article, which is easy to read for the audience. There are no grammar mistake or spelling error in the article. The content is also broke down into sub sections, helping the audience to read.

Images and Media
The image added by the author is very well laid out, the author arranged the position of these images in an appealling way, which can give the audience a better experience. The image is also related to the content and well captioned, helps the reader to underststand the content better. Wuhudasima (talk) 22:44, 7 April 2024 (UTC)