User talk:Publis the Second

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Appealing a Block from an Administrator

 * You do not appear to be directly blocked. I suspect you encountered an autoblock, which happens when someone else on your network is blocked.  Please cut and paste the block message that you see when you try to edit a page to here, and we may be able to track down the issue. Syrthiss (talk) 14:20, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Here we go:

You are currently unable to edit pages on Wikipedia. You can still read pages, but you cannot edit, move, or create them. Editing from Publis the Second has been blocked (disabled) by DoRD for the following reason(s): Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CentristFiasco This block has been set to expire: no expiry set. Even if blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page and contact other editors and administrators by e-mail. Note: Please use the [show] links across from each header to show more information.

I just recently read through the investigation and it was by Equazcion in which I contacted before due to a reverted issue. I think he thinks I'm Centrist Fiasco, you can view his Talk Page or history of his Talk Page and check what I wrote to him. Publis the Second (talk) 14:26, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * See Sockpuppet investigations/CentristFiasco; though this unblock request seems to have come before the block showed up in the block log. Maybe someone has now implemented a rangeblock? It would be appropriate, seeing the frequency of sock accounts from this person.  Equazcion  ( talk )  14:30, 1 Jun 2012 (UTC)

Let me get this straight. You were the likely one who alleged this in the first place and now you want to go back? I hope that you took my advise that I wrote to you a couple of hours ago. You are a sign of poor judgement, bro. You need to take a break from this site for a while. Publis the Second (talk) 14:34, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * It's already been confirmed that you're a sock of CentristFiasco, if you see the investigation page. My having alleged it is of little consequence now.  Equazcion  ( talk )  14:37, 1 Jun 2012 (UTC)

You just admitted that I was blocked by a rangeblock which means, an administrator blocked people on my network which is Comcast. This is a very broad ban which could essentially affect everybody who has Comcast who lives in my town. The town that I live in is in the top twenty biggest cities in the United States. Again, you seriously need to take a break from this site. The events that you obviously went through with CentristFiasco and his accounts has affected your judgement and possibly the administrators who cater to you as well. It's bad to have your way all the time, it ultimately affects your ways and means of communicating with others. This is played out on the Article's talk page. You obviously think you're above everybody who contributes to Articles you care about. Elitist. Publis the Second (talk) 14:40, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * They may have just blocked your IP. Even if it was a rangeblock, that doesn't mean they blocked all of Comcast in your area. Besides which, the investigation page indicates you've been confirmed to be a sock, not merely within their range. That confirmation came independently from someone else, not me.  Equazcion  ( talk )  14:46, 1 Jun 2012 (UTC)

Goodness, you're so disillusioned about your own catering, bro. Don't you get it? Not all administrators actually blocks users effectively nor in a justifiable manner. They didn't do any investigation by any means. All they did was look at your shitty evidence in which I have read, and read through Associate J's contributions. This investigation is overly fucking absurd. They catered to you and it's so fucking obvious. Publis the Second (talk) 14:49, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I had no idea I was that popular :) Your block isn't based merely on my summary. That's just what gave us a reason to check further. The sock was confirmed by checkuser.  Equazcion  ( talk )  15:17, 1 Jun 2012 (UTC)

I'm furthering this case to the ARB and I'm going to mention you and your actions. Publis the Second (talk) 15:18, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Make sure they get the spelling right. Some people tend to put the "c" before the "z", that's why I mention that.  Equazcion  ( talk )  15:21, 1 Jun 2012 (UTC)

You think you're going to win this case, don't you? Know what? I'm not going contact the ARB, I'm going to create another account in due time and show how much of an elitist you are, and I will make your time on Wikipedia a living hell for the next seven months. Publis the Second (talk) 15:29, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Threats of continued socking probably won't help your unblock requests. ArbCom cases need to be accepted first, and this wouldn't be accepted because you're a confirmed sockpuppeteer. The case is pretty much closed. I'm not sure what you're hoping to accomplish, but if it's to affect the Occupy Wall Street article, you're not going to succeed, because you haven't been listening to the criticism of your edits. That's essential for every editor, and you're not special. If you just want to have fun trying to evade the system, I guess you'll continue to do so, at least until we see a need to get more aggressive in our blocks. You're not making life difficult for me though, or else I would be pushing for those more aggressive tactics.  Equazcion  ( talk )  15:42, 1 Jun 2012 (UTC)

I don't listen to feedback? Clearly, you have never read the contributions I've made by any means. For crying at loud, you don't even provide proper summaries to justify your fucking reverts. Ever. Not even from other contributors. You think I'm the problem? Oh please. Publis the Second (talk) 15:45, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Enough bickering. I've removed talk page access for Publis -if they want to be unblocked, they can contact WP:BASC. Equazcion, please stop engaging them -it's only encouraging the problem. TN X Man 15:48, 1 June 2012 (UTC)