User talk:Publisher628

March 2023
Hello Publisher628. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Hybrid AdTech, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Publisher628. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Uhai (talk) 05:27, 17 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I wanted to inform that I have already tagged the company that indirectly pays me for editing. I am not writing this on behalf of the company, just informative about the company where im working at. Hope it is neutrally written enough. If not, please advise Publisher628 (talk) 12:32, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Hybrid AdTech moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Hybrid AdTech, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Uhai (talk) 05:37, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Hybrid AdTech moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Hybrid AdTech. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and you have declared paid editing.. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:42, 27 March 2023 (UTC)


 * You are not allowed to move this article into the main article space past the AfC review process, as you have declared your paid editing status. Also, the contents are almost entirely unreferenced. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:44, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Hybrid AdTech


A tag has been placed on Draft:Hybrid AdTech, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:39, 7 April 2023 (UTC)