User talk:Publisuisse-en

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
 * Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?


 * What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead. If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  12:26, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your answer, Peridon. So, if I skip the words "premium" and "complete", it would be more suitable? "These electronic media products enable publisuisse to offer Swiss advertisers a range of services"

In connection with the change of the username of course.
 * Please sign talk page posts with four ~ things - makes it easier to see who said what. I'd advise avoiding 'enable' and 'offer' too. 'Offer' implies 'we are selling' (unless the speaker is a gangster or a policeman, in either case providing a way out that may be marginally better than the alternative...). 'Publisuisse provides' is more neutral. ('Take it or leave it' rather than 'Roll up! Roll up!'.) The issue of notability is important. There are many big and/or successful businesses that don't get articles because no-one's given them any coverage. An example is the company making own-brand goods for supermarkets. Millions of tins every day - all bearing someone else's name. Only the employees and the Infernal Revenue know who they are. There are small companies who are widely covered in reliable independent sources. I've just flicked through the first 10 pages of Google hits for "publisuisse" and not seen anything I bothered to investigate closer. Unless they do something really horrible, people don't tend to discuss marketing companies unless they are in the trade themselves. See what you can find, after reading WP:RS. We're more concerned about referencing here than are some of the other Wikipedias I've edited on or visited. Peridon (talk) 12:29, 19 August 2013 (UTC)