User talk:Pubprincipal

CACI and Abu Ghraib
I would like to invite you to participate in discussion on how the Abu Ghraib issue is being handled on the CACI article. You appear to be quite familiar with this topic (it is the only article you've edited so far), which is great since you provided many of the details of CACI's business, such as the most current count of employees, acquisitions, etc. (By the way, I encourage you to cite these sources so readers will know it isn't original research or hearsay.) I realize discussion of Abu Ghraib may be uncomfortable, but nobody questions that it was extremely notable in the world press and that CACI employees were widely reported to have been involved. You have offered brief criticisms of this discussion and deleted the whole Abu Ghraib section from the CACI article a number of times. As I outlined on the Talk page in the past, there are more constructive ways to handle problems in the article, such as using better sources, fixing biased language, giving appropriate balance to all issues discussed, and adding new facts as they are discovered. If there are problems in the Abu Ghraib discussion, you can fix them or flag them, but simply deleting all mention of the controversy robs the article's credibility. ——Rich jj (talk) 14:57, 28 July 2011 (UTC)