User talk:Puccipu

WP:AN/I
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:49, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Dear Sir,

I am the Secretary General of the European Alliance for Freedom (EAF). So I know well what we stand for and definitely not what is written on wikipedia. I am trying to correct Wiki on the misinformation there, which keeps reverting back to misleading and blatant lies about our organisation. Our website state what we stand for. I for one am a Socialist, stood for EU elections in 2009 with the Socialist Party in Malta and being labelled a hard right winger is pathetic indeed. This is purely a political sabotage by our opponents. We don't believe in left and right ideologies at a European level and we don't believe in labelling anyone. Our aim and objectives are to reform and protect national democracies. I will therefore correct once again this misinformation and hopefully you take action and block whoever is trying to sabotage it in the first place. Puccipu (talk) 16:17, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Are these your accounts also?
 * User:Doroteasloboda
 * User:Alliance of european freedom
 * User:European Alliance for Freedom
 * User:Eurallfree
 * Please answer.
 * Also, regardless of the accuracy of the article, you must read, understand, and follow our Conflict of interest guideline. Further, insisting that you are going to edit war to your preferred version of the article is not acceptable. We work collaboratively here. Also, your edits were copied from another website without any evidence it was release from copyright. Further, the copied content was not neutral. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:22, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * No those are not my accounts. we have permission to reproduce the text from the website of the said organisation. So no copyright was breached. Puccipu (talk) 16:59, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The language is still non-neutral and would not be accepted here. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:02, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at European Alliance for Freedom, you may be blocked from editing. Werieth (talk) 15:56, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Dear Sir,

I am the Secretary General of the European Alliance for Freedom (EAF). So I know well what we stand for and definitely not what is written on wikipedia. I am trying to correct Wiki on the misinformation there, which keeps reverting back to misleading and blatant lies about our organisation. Our website state what we stand for. I for one am a Socialist, stood for EU elections in 2009 with the Socialist Party in Malta and being labelled a hard right winger is pathetic indeed. This is purely a political sabotage by our opponents. We don't believe in left and right ideologies at a European level and we don't believe in labelling anyone. Our aim and objectives are to reform and protect national democracies. I will therefore correct once again this misinformation and hopefully you take action and block whoever is trying to sabotage it in the first place.Puccipu (talk) 16:15, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Eurallfree for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Werieth (talk) 16:01, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Dear Sir,

I am the Secretary General of the European Alliance for Freedom (EAF). So I know well what we stand for and definitely not what is written on wikipedia. I am trying to correct Wiki on the misinformation there, which keeps reverting back to misleading and blatant lies about our organisation. Our website state what we stand for. I for one am a Socialist, stood for EU elections in 2009 with the Socialist Party in Malta and being labelled a hard right winger is pathetic indeed. This is purely a political sabotage by our opponents. We don't believe in left and right ideologies at a European level and we don't believe in labelling anyone. Our aim and objectives are to reform and protect national democracies. I will therefore correct once again this misinformation and hopefully you take action and block whoever is trying to sabotage it in the first place.16:15, 29 January 2013 (UTC)Puccipu (talk)


 * Dear Madam,
 * Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your interest in this project. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia project, based on verifiability with reliable sources. It is not a place where people, organisations or companies may present (or promote) themselves. Self-statements by the subjects of our articles are not considered reliable sources for an encyclopedia. Only third-party, secondary sources are. Your organisation has been described as right-wing in mainstream European media, this is what counts for us. Even if you personally do not identify as right-wing, the majority of parties linked to the alliance are described as right-wing (or even far-right) by reputable, mainstream media and by political scientists: FPÖ, Vlaams Belang, Sweden Democrats, Front National. Your alliance has been perceived by observers as hard Eurosceptic in contrast to the British Tories and their allies in the Alliance of European Conservatives and Reformists, who are considered soft Eurosceptic. As you are an executive of your organisation, you are strongly advised against editing the Wikipedia article on your organisation, because this is considered a WP:Conflict of interest by the Wikipedia community. If executives or representatives of an organisation edit their own Wikipedia articles, it always raises the suspicion that their interest is to promote rather than to inform neutrally. Please consider that repeated infractions of Policies and guidelines may lead to your account being blocked. Thank you for your understanding. Kind regards --RJFF (talk) 17:34, 29 January 2013 (UTC)