User talk:Pucks

Image tagging for Image:Saxon.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Saxon.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 01:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Bustamante Industrial Trade Union
Hi Pucks. I cut your edit back out of the BITU because it appeared to be a copyright from http://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/pages/history/story0034.html. I would encourage you to use the source that you have and rewrite the history in your own words. It would be great to have the information in the article.

BTW - welcome to Wikipedia! Let me know if I can be of any help. Cheers.--Bookandcoffee 03:27, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Saxon.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Media copyright questions. Thank you.

Orphaned non-free media (File:SCHSC.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:SCHSC.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Andrew Holness.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Andrew Holness.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

St. Catherine High
Greetings Pucks,

You placed the following in a comment in St. Catherine High:

"TO WIKIPEDIA PAGE EDITORS THE FOLLOWING PAGE EDIT AS OF SEPTEMBER 08, 2009 CONTAINS INFORMATION RELATED DIRECTLY TO THE SCHOOL ALL IS ENCYCLOPEDIC. I APPRECIATE THE PRUNING DONE BUT AS THIS IS MY SCHOOL IN JAMAICA THE CURRENT INFORMATION IS IMPORTANT TO JAMAICANS. THANK YOU. THE HEAD STUDENTS SUCH AS HEAD BOY ARE IMPOSTANT INFORMATION IT WILL BE UPDATED AS SOON AS A NEW ONE IS SELECTED. WE FOLLOW THE UK STYLE SCHOOL SYSTEM, MY WIKINAME IS PUCKS"

One good test of what constitutes encyclopaedic information is "Will this be of interest/relevance in 10, 20, 50 years time?" Of-the-moment information such as the current head boy/girl clearly fails such a test. If this were not the case then you can be sure that Infobox school would have fields for that kind of information.

Much good work has been done on this article so do not be put off. But do try to discover established practice on Wikipedia and to fit in with it. You will find the time you spend here more productive and enjoyable that way. -Arb. (talk) 14:00, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Catherine.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:Catherine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  Zoo Fari  04:12, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Catherine Crest.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:Catherine Crest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  Zoo Fari  04:13, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:St. Catherine Logo.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:St. Catherine Logo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 06:10, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Jago Prep.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Jago Prep.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 06:11, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

April 2011
The article RMS Saxon has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material from to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:12, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Buxton House, The Mico University College.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Buxton House, The Mico University College.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:06, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Upload your free media to Commons, please!
It is better if your free images can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons as opposed to Wikipedia. Freely licensed or public domain media are more accessible to other Wikimedia projects if placed on Commons. Thank you: Jay8g (talk) 01:48, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Repost of Template:Infobox professor
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead recreating the page. Thank you. Red rose64 (talk) 17:14, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)