User talk:Pugpitbullduck

October 2009
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cillian Murphy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  16:53, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Religion
Why have you been deleting categories relating to religious belief from various articles? As you have given no reason for these deletions in either the articles' talk pages or your edit summaries I've taken the liberty to revert those deletions where the articles support the original categorisation. On the face of it your actions appear to be vandalism; you can avoid this and help other editors to understand your reasons by discussing them first or at the very least explaining them in the edit summaries. Cheers -- Timberframe (talk) 16:54, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Seconded, seriously, give a reason why you are doing what you're doing. Ian.thomson (talk) 13:14, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Farrah Fawcett. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ''You've been notified and warned about removing the religious affiliation from articles when they are supported by article content. From this point forward, it will be considered vandalism. '' Wildhartlivie (talk) 02:25, 2 November 2009 (UTC)