User talk:Pulsifier220

April 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Goldfinch (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Mia o w   16:51, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of Columbia Pictures films. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:42, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Please don't add unsourced production companies; see this consensus that production companies require sourcing. The comingsoon.net source that you added for Wish Dragon also does not say that Columbia is producing it.  It says that Sony Animation is producing it, which is not the same thing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:44, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Captain Marvel (film), you may be blocked from editing. TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:48, 24 April 2018 (UTC) Please disregard the final warning I had previously posted on this page. Thank you and have a nice day. IanDBeacon (talk) 13:44, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Underwater (film). IanDBeacon (talk) 02:21, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Unsourced production companies
Again, please stop making unsourced edits, as you did, which added a bunch of unsourced entries to List of Universal Pictures films. If you don't know where to look for sources, please ask at WikiProject Film or see this list. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:35, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Godzilla: King of the Monsters (2019 film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.  Mia o w   13:04, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at List of 20th Century Fox films (2000–present). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:35, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The next time you add unsourced content or remove sourced content, I'm going to ask an uninvolved administrator to block you from editing Wikipedia. This is your last warning.  This has been explained to you enough times. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:36, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

ANI notification
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:30, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 17:42, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Shock and Awe (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.  The Old Jacobite The '45 18:30, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bohemian Rhapsody (film), you may be blocked from editing.  The Old Jacobite The '45 13:54, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Backseat (film).  The Old Jacobite The '45 17:49, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ron h jones (Talk) 18:55, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Grudge (film). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Didn't you just come off a 1 month block for this? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:59, 25 July 2018 (UTC) Ok.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Columbia Pictures films. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:40, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Your recent editing history at Spider-Man: Far From Home shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:17, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for the persistent addition of unsourced content and edit warring. See also this AN/I thread. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:35, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


 * I’m really not the editor one would want to model oneself around. Rusted AutoParts  21:02, 24 August 2018 (UTC) Why  do you think that?

February 2019
Do you realize that you are promising to "cause or be a part of any edit war"? 331dot (talk) 20:43, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

That was my bad, it was a typo. Thanks for pointing that out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pulsifier220 (talk • contribs)
 * Pulsifier220, what reliable sources would you add to Surf Nazis Must Die? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:37, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Sources that basically confirm the fact that the film is real, and tell me all about the film. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pulsifier220 (talk • contribs)
 * Are there specific sources that you would use? SQL Query me!  21:32, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

I would use sources like Comicbook.com or deadline.com