User talk:Punk physicist

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 18:21, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Thanks for the warm welcome Ahunt, I'm a big fan of Wikipedia and plan on staying for quite a while.Punk physicist (talk) 20:28, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Well since you have been here a little while you know that there is an almost infinite amount of stuff to do. Let me know if you have any questions as you get more into it. - Ahunt (talk) 23:39, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Viewnior for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Viewnior is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Viewnior until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rincewind42 (talk) 05:19, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Please review this article
Hello! I've done substantial work on the Geiger-Marsden experiment article and have submitted it for peer review. However, nobody has taken notice, so I am resorting to directly contacting Wikipedians who have a background in physics. If you have the time, would you care to review this article, and tell me if is worthy of being featured on the Main Page? Kurzon (talk) 15:20, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Request to review an article
Hi, I have created and developed a page on Clebsch-Gordan coefficient for SU(3). This is my first article. It will be really helpful if you find some time to take a look at the article and propose any improvements if necessary. Thank you. Arkadipta Sarkar (talk) 15:21, 14 November 2014 (UTC)Arkadipta Sarkar

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Punk physicist! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 17:27, Wednesday, May 27, 2015 (UTC)

Fortifying wikiquanta
Hi, I seek volunteers for this. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 17:55, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Question about Elitzur-Vaidman/MZ interferometer
Thanks for your contributions! I hope you can clear this up for me. In regard to the above experiment:

If the bomb is a dud, can there ever be no photon detected at either detector?

In other words, if the bomb is a dud, and the photon remains in its superposition until it reaches the end of both the lower and upper paths and the second half-silvered mirror, can it interfere with itself destructively, resulting in no detection? Or does it always interfere with itself constructively, resulting in a detection at one of the detectors, but never the other one?

Thanks again. Informata ob Iniquitatum (talk) 02:05, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Mark WikiProject Linux as inactive?
Hi! I was directed to your talk page by the participants list on  WikiProject Linux. I've started a discussion whether we can keep it running, or mark it as inactive.–  Abuluntu  ( talk 06:40, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Quantum Volume for the IonQ device
Hello. In the edit just before you added this claim, I removed the claim. Now you added it again! :) Anyways, the source you give is just to their web page? Or maybe I missed something. There seems to be a relevant press release here. Notice that they start with saying they have 32 perfect qubits, but then at the end they are saying that they have 22 algorithmic qubits, that can be used for actual quantum computing. It may be the case that the volume of 4 billion is a marketing stunt?? According to the press release they say that "We expect our 32 qubit system to provide 22 Algorithmic Qubits (AQ), a new quantum computing metric we introduced alongside our roadmap in December 2020." (my boldface). I am not sure, but I do think that a better source is needed at the very least. · · · Omnissiahs hierophant (talk) 15:51, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Clear Linux
Intel's container Linux distribution, Draft:Clear Linux article has started, would you like to contribute? .... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 23:14, 24 August 2021 (UTC)