User talk:Punnani Katabbani

Welcome!
Hello, Yucheng Quentin Pan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I am pleased to present you with your very first service award, in recognition of becoming a Wikipedia contributor.

I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that may help you to get up to speed: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * The Signpost, our newspaper.

Again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 10:02, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 16:50, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Yucheng Quentin Pan, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Tone (linguistics) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:22, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Thank you for your edits to Grammar. They are helpful! Please seriously consider the comments of March 2019 regarding edit summaries.—Anita5192 (talk) 16:15, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Wired UK article about Brexit Wikpedia page
Hi Yucheng Quentin Pan,

I'm a journalist for Wired UK magazine and I'm writing a piece about the Brexit Wikipedia page. I see that you've been a really active contributor to the entry and would love to talk to you about it. Are you up for being interviewed for the piece?

You can find my email on my Twitter page if so.

Thanks, Matt Mrey445 (talk) 10:02, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Consonant voicing and devoicing
Re: this edit – Please do not remove citation templates. Those templates embed information that is not visible to readers but may be useful to robots/analysts. Your edit also made the links in the footnotes not work. Nardog (talk) 14:15, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited East Indies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Indians ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/East_Indies check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/East_Indies?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Standard Chinese
Hello- is there any website ending with .tw that says that so-called 'Standard Chinese' is the official language of Taiwan? If not, please be a little bit more careful when using this wording as it was used here. Taiwanese Mandarin is probably what you were thinking of. Thanks. Geographyinitiative (talk) 13:49, 6 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your message. Taiwan currently does not have a de jure official language, but the de facto official language is Standard Chinese. The current phrasing of "the most common language used in government" is acceptable to me, but there isn't a clear-cut difference between Standard Chinese and Taiwanese Mandarin. To me, Standard Chinese is a hypernym of both Putonghua and Guoyu (Taiwanese Mandarin). The official use of both governments (of Taiwan and mainland China) would be closer to the "standard", while the way ordinary Taiwanese people speak inclines to Taiwanese Mandarin. Punnani Katabbani (talk) 14:37, 16 October 2019 (UTC)


 * "but the de facto official language is Standard Chinese." (no proof provided) "but there isn't a clear-cut difference between Standard Chinese and Taiwanese Mandarin." (Don't you see that Standard Chinese is a PRC concept?) To me, Standard Chinese is synonym of Putonghua and an attempt to pretend Mandarin equals Chinese, like saying French is the Standard Romance Language. The people on Taiwan never use the term Standard Chinese in reference to Guoyu (Taiwanese Mandarin) as far as I have seen, and I would need specific, clear evidence to the contrary to be led to believe otherwise. Geographyinitiative (talk) 22:50, 16 October 2019 (UTC)


 * There is at least one clear-cut difference between Standard Chinese and Taiwanese Mandarin: we know for certain that one of these terms is unquestionably relevant to the language in Taiwan. Specific proof that the other term is relevant to Taiwan is needed. Geographyinitiative (talk) 22:59, 16 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Called Mandarin, not Standard Chinese. Speaking objectively, China is presently not a free country (https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2019/china) and Taiwan is one of the freest countries in the world (https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2019/taiwan). They may use different terminology to refer to similar but different concepts. Geographyinitiative (talk) 23:03, 16 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Also, there is one more possibility: these nation-states may not have anything like the western concept of an 'official language'. 'Official language' is a concept rooted in the Western legal framework and may not apply anywhere else really (although the Western mindset seeks to impose itself everywhere and hence we sometimes assume things are "official languages" when no such statement has been made by the official organs of government). The USA federal gov has no official language, and it doesn't need one. Other governments may do the same. Geographyinitiative (talk) 23:08, 16 October 2019 (UTC)


 * I will try to be as objective as I can in this matter. I think what I would need to see is specific reasoning that would mean that the languages in these dictionaries (http://dict.concised.moe.edu.tw & http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw) can be called Standard Chinese. Without that evidence, all I can see is Taiwanese Mandarin. I would think that the people that run Putonghua Proficiency Test would think that the langauge outlined in those two dictionaries is definitely not Standard Chinese and is more like Taiwanese Mandarin, but that's my guess. Sorry for sending so many comments, but I may be a little too passionate about this! Thanks for your time. Geographyinitiative (talk) 23:20, 16 October 2019 (UTC)