User talk:PunxtawneyPickle

Welcome!
Hello, PunxtawneyPickle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Longhair\talk 02:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
 * style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | Bubble Tea.png


 * style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Bubble tea is disgusting. That said - why did you delete my entire section "Controversy" from the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez article seconds after I added it?  You obviously reverted the edit without taking time to read it and check the cites.  I can only assume that you reverted the edit simply because it included criticism of this liberal darling.  But politics aside, disallowing any criticism of Ms. Ocasio-Cortez violates the very foundation on which Wikipedia rests  - a neutral point of view.  If the only statements allowed in an article are those which are laudatory, the article becomes nothing more than a political ad.  Wikipedia is supposed to be inclusive and objective.  Please step back, be objective and fair-minded, and return my edit to its rightful place in the article.JohnTopShelf (talk) 02:18, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!
How can there ever be consensus about whether or not an article on AOC should include criticism? Her supporters, of which there appear to be many among Wikipedia editors, would never agree with inclusion of any criticism. But without inclusion of criticism, properly cited, there can be no neutral point of view.JohnTopShelf (talk) 02:43, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Notice
--MONGO (talk) 03:11, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Personal attacks
Stop with the "complicit" business and the aspersions against other editors. This is an encyclopedia, not an internet forum, and you are expected to treat other editors with respect. You may face sanctions if this behavior continues.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:37, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for recasting the discussion. Leave your views on other editors out of it. You might also want to read WP:NOTNEWS.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:46, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
 * No, it's not acceptable for you to keep carrying on with observations concerning what you think other editors are thinking., This is your final warning.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:36, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

DS block
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violating post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people page restrictions on William Barr, where you have reverted without attempting to reach consensus on the talk page or even explaining your edit in an edit summary. This behaviour will no longer be tolerated. When your block expires, feel free to participate in the discussion I created regarding this particular dispute (sorry for the following repetition, it's part of the template). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. El_C 11:00, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Good to know that you have been notified of the discretionary sanctions again. That means I can block you if you violate 1RR. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:13, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Ginger Canzoneri moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Ginger Canzoneri, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:19, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ginger Canzoneri
Hello, PunxtawneyPickle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ginger Canzoneri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sam Moskowitz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Frazier. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ginger Canzoneri


Hello, PunxtawneyPickle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ginger Canzoneri".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:53, 19 July 2022 (UTC)