User talk:Purdygb

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Purdygb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Rosiestep (talk) 03:07, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:57, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Message sent with Global message delivery.

July 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to The Shock Doctrine, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:00, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. You posted the following statement in the article on Lev Landau. "Robert Maxwell, the head of Pergamon Press, which publishes some of the English translations of Landau's works, was with him in the car and was instrumental in getting him to the hospital in time." Do you have a reliable source for this information? If the only source for this was a statement by Captain Bob himself, then an appropriate way to phrase it would be that "Maxwell claimed on such and such a date..." (Maxwell's dishonesty is well known.)

For the time being I have deleted the statement about Captain Bob. The rest of the paragraph is backed by citations to reliable sources. Having a completely unsourced statement in that paragraph causes problems.--Toddy1 (talk) 05:45, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Annus Mirabilis papers. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 18:29, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Conjectures
Re this edit: please be more careful with the word "conjecture". It is used when a mathematician has a strong belief that a question has a particular answer, without having a full proof. In the case in question, the authors clearly did not have any such belief. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:05, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Orchard-planting problem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ron Graham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:16, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)