User talk:Puregoldxxxx


 * }

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Paul.Polansky.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Paul.Polansky.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 03:01, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:PaulPolansky.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PaulPolansky.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 03:02, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:PaulPolansky.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:PaulPolansky.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mt king  (edits)  03:17, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Paul.Polansky.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Paul.Polansky.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mt king  (edits)  03:19, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Hello Puregoldxxxx. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Paul Polansky, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Mt king  (edits)  09:20, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Verifying permission for images
Hi, Marco. Thanks for your note. I believe I should be able to help you especially with the image concern.

What's needed here is for you to verify that you have authority to license these images so that they can be retained on Wikipedia. Except for a very few exceptions (usually in biographies of deceased individuals), portraits uploaded here must be released by the copyright holder under a free license. We allow several, but they share in common a requirement that others be allowed to reuse the work (even commercially) and that the work be released for modifications.

The simplest way to release content for reuse on Wikipedia is to license it at the official website. For example, you might make a subgallery (akin to this one) where you collect the images you wish to release and place a notice on the page something like this:
 * The images on this page are available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).

(Please be sure that Mr. Polansky himself has the right to authorize your license of these images. Usually, copyright in a portrait is owned by the photographer, unless the rights are transferred. These licenses are not the only options and they are not both required, but they are the ones we recommend. I can give you other options if you prefer.

Since the images have already been deleted, an administrator will need to help you bring them back, if you place that release on the website. If you leave a note on my user talk page, I'll be happy to help with that, although it can sometimes take me a couple of days to respond to notes. :)

If you would prefer not to place a release on the site, that's okay--we can work around that. But it is a little more complicated. In that case, we would need an email clearly identifiable to the official domain specifically identifying the images (the title under which they were uploaded on Wikipedia) and verifying their license. The form letter we recommend is here: Declaration of consent for all enquiries. That page also includes the email address to which the letter should be sent.

In that case, you should hear back within a few days from an email volunteer agent processing your letter, either confirming the license or pointing out issues with the permission that must first be addressed.

In terms of the quotes about the material, that's a little bit trickier. First, Mr. Polansky does not own copyright to those, and so they must conform to our non-free content policy and guideline. We need verifiable citations (specific details about where and when these things were said so that our readers can assess them) and clearly marked quotations. Even with those things, however, it's really not a good idea for a representative of a creative professional to place critical praise for that professional's work on Wikipedia. The project has very strict notions about perceive conflicts of interest, and you and Mr. Polansky should really be very careful to ensure that any content you add to the article is clearly neutral. It's better to let a reader eventually expand on critical reception than to risk your edits being mistaken as promotional.

Please let me know at my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ordinarily, I would watch your talk page so that I can respond here, but I'm afraid that my work schedule makes me prone to miss a lot at the moment. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:34, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
ww2censor (talk) 19:34, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Paul Polansky. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 20:08, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Websites like allpoetry.com do not meet our standards for sources, since they do not fact-check what is placed there, and in fact could be filled with lies, hoaxes and exaggerations. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  20:44, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you Orange Mike for your reply and for the enlightenment. I will try to find other sources. Kind Regards, Puregoldxxxx (talk) 20:51, 6 October 2011 (UTC).