User talk:Purnendu sharad shukla

Psshukla (talk) 12:09, 14 July 2015 (UTC)Purnendu Sharad ShuklaPsshukla (talk) 12:09, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Writter: Purnendu Sharad Shukla (July 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Non-dropframe was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Purnendu sharad shukla/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Purnendu_sharad_shukla/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Non-dropframe&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Purnendu_sharad_shukla/sandbox reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Non-Dropframe   talk   03:16, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Purnendu sharad shukla


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Purnendu sharad shukla requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:18, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SAJAA E ISHQ
Hello Purnendu sharad shukla,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SAJAA E ISHQ for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Nile481216 04:01, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

You have been wasting the time of other editors by such pointless activities as repeatedly creating articles and draft articles with no content, repeatedly submitting declined drafts without any changes, editing messages to replace valid links with false links that lead nowhere, and so on. Meanwhile you have made no constructive edits at all. You were told that continuing to waste other editors' time in this way would lead to being blocked, but you have ignored that information, and continued with the same kind of nonsense, using two different accounts. Both accounts have therefore been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:59, 15 July 2015 (UTC)