User talk:Purpl9

Miracle Mineral Supplement
Please read Identifying reliable sources (medicine), and discuss any further changes to the article on the talk page. We de not cite 'Natural News' and similar conspiracy-theory websites in articles. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:26, 25 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Not sure if we are talking about the same website here. NaturalNews.com is not a conspiracy-theory website WP:ATTACK, it a perfectly legit news reporting agency WP:COMPREHENSIVE, and the article is linking to a video that speaks for itself. Thanks. WP:NPOV purpl9 (talk) 25 October 2014


 * A website that claims that the Red Cross is engaged in a coverup concerning MMS is self-evidently a conspiracy-theory website, as anyone can plainly see. And per Wikipedia policies and guidelines, the only legitimate sources regarding claims for medical efficacy are those described in WP:MEDRS. If you wish to edit the MMS article, you will need to do so according to Wikipedia policy. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:35, 25 October 2014 (UTC)


 * You can see that. I do not share your opinion in the slightest. The video linked to the Natural News article is depicting Klaas Proesmans acting as narrator of a video where Sodium chlorite is peddled as a cure for Malaria. Have you not seen the video? Klaas Proesmans is the CEO of the Water Reference Center, heavily affiliated with the IFRC. You can see it's Proesmans by going to their website, and you can also see that the Water Reference Center was founded by two national Red Cross societies. Get your facts straight. WP:ATTACK purpl9 (talk) 25 October 2014


 * I don't give a toss regarding your opinion - if you persist in violating Wikipedia policies, I shall have no option but to ask that you be blocked from editing. And no, I'm not the slightest bit interested in watching any video promoting toxic quackery. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:42, 25 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Are you really now. WP:ATTACK If you are not interested in looking at the sources, then you have no business editing this page. The sources I have provided are both valid. Also, Sodium chlorite is already approved as an orphan drug for ALS, so the idea that Sodium chlorite is quackery, is ridiculous. WP:NPOV purpl9 (talk) 25 October 2014

October 2014
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war on the article Miracle Mineral Supplement. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 00:56, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:15, 25 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Because I used the International Federation of the Red Cross and Natural News as sources to document an EVENT taking place? The event is documented by two videos filmed by two seperate producers in two seperate videos, and you try to block it by calling Sodium chlorite "Quackery", a mineral that has been approved as an orphan-drug for ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis I am not down with your pseudoresearch apologist attitude. This is not about a scientific document, it is about an event taking place. A happening. NaturalNews.com and the official IFRC website are both valid websites to talk about such an event. WP:NPOV purpl9 (talk) 25 October 2014


 * If you're going to ignore people telling you what our policies are, then you're not going to last long here. I've blocked this account until we have some indication you're going to follow our policies. Rule #1: Don't push fringe crap that can kill people here.--Floquenbeam (talk) 01:32, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Just to be clear, Rule #2 is Don't push anything else, either. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 02:03, 25 October 2014 (UTC)