User talk:Purplechrain

Welcome!
Hello, Purplechrain, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Draft:Haykin Family Cider, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! GPL93 (talk) 19:32, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks GPL93. I am pretty new to this world. I noticed that the list of cider companies is sorely lacking... especially in actual award winning ones. So I tried to add them to the cider company list and learned they couldn't be redlined. So I'm on a bit of a mission to get high quality cider companies listed. All of them are notable, just not huge corps. So... ... how do I make the page I did a draft and ask you to help me proof read it? :) Thanks! Purplechrain (talk) 21:10, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * No problem. Your draft is submitted and so you generally will get feedback on what needs to be worked on both if its accepted or if the draft is rejected. The AfC reviewers will likely be able to give you better advice than I can, but I suggest reading some of the links above regarding creating articles as well as WP:NCORP, which is probably going to be the notability standard that you are going to have to pass by showing coverage of Haykin Family Cider by Reliable Sources. I hope I've helped out, if not just ask at Teahouse. Best, GPL93 (talk) 21:27, 16 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 8 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,472 pending submissions waiting for review. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:31, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Haykin Family Cider


A tag has been placed on Draft:Haykin Family Cider, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  DGG ( talk ) 05:59, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Hello, Purplechrain. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 09:12, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

DebI'm not advertising... there are company pages for a number of other cider companies but none of them are significant... they make mediocre cider. I like cider and follow the international competition glintcap so I planned to make pages for all the top cideries that make actual good cider instead of crummy cider. But wiki doesn't seem to care... and only rewards large companies rather than small batch companies. There are amazing cideries out there and wiki features none of them. That was what I was trying to do. Many of these cideries are quite notable... including Haykin... which won the most gold medals of any commercial cidery this year, which is why I started with them. Purplechrain (talk) 17:07, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * There is nothing to stop you having another go at creating a draft. Just watch out for the things that are suggestive of promotional intent, especially anything that reads like a press release from the company. Unfortunately we don't reward quality; notability must be clearly shown. Deb (talk) 17:11, 29 October 2019 (UTC)


 * I used other cider company pages as a template so I would fit the guidelines. It's similar to this page... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2_Towns_Ciderhouse I fail to see the issue since I used content found in news reports about them. There's like 400 news reports about them. Tons of press. Also, building those tables were really difficult and time consuming. And it was just trashed. It's clear there's no concern to actual quality of product. And that's what I was aiming to fix by building pages for small and notable cideries. Purplechrain (talk) 17:14, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * There's a mismatch between the statement "I used other cider company pages as a template" and the perceived consequence "so I would fit the guidelines". See Other stuff exists. Deb (talk) 19:57, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
 * PS. I've been looking at your deleted content and I think I could help you get it through a review but I would need to remove a lot of it, including the tables (listing all their products was just asking for trouble). Do you want me to create a new draft for you to work on? Deb (talk) 07:46, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Ok. I mean I was looking for what was considered notable and how they were formulated as a precedent for how to structure the page so it wouldn't be considered advertising. Yes, I would appreciate that, if you can assist me so I can understand what you mean. Also, that's not all their products - that was their awards. They make 40+ unique vintage related ciders each year. Is it better to list their best in class and gold award winners then say "plus 12 silvers and 3 bronzes" or something like that? Purplechrain (talk) 20:19, 4 November 2019 (UTC)