User talk:Purplethekid

05:55, 25 April 2018 (UTC)Tkjenkins (talk)§

Hey Purple
Greetings, Purple! I think it's pretty cool that you took some time off before college to live your life and get some random experiences and travel in. Most people don't have the courage or initiative to do that, even though I bet a lot of people want to. I'm sure you get this question a lot, but how did you get the name Purple? Given what I know about you already, I bet it's an interesting story. (P.S. Not sure if I'm using this talk page correctly, I guess someone will correct me if I'm not) Miasmith22 (talk) 23:55, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Purplethekid, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:22, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review 2
Lead Section:

- I feel somewhat satisfied knowing the importance of the topic. I believe you're referring to class differences which became more apparent when you discussed it in reference to media and how it is portrayed using this outlet.

- I think you could perhaps expand on a history of the origin, where it originated from and how it became a term to refer people of lower class or higher class division.

Structure: - I thought the page was structured very neatly and was easy to follow. Normally I would recommend a picture, but I think it might be difficult to find a suitable one given your topic.

Balance: - I don't think there are any major points left out but you could expand further on the sections that you currently do have on the page.

-Nothing seemed to be off topic.

Neutral: -There were no biases or specific perspectives in the article itself. It was very informative and fact based.

Resources: - The resources seemed good and you cited the quotation that you used in the first section giving a direct definition of the word you were informing on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lpastorella (talk • contribs) 21:01, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review 2
Lead Section:

The importance of the topic is perfectly explained in the introduction. I do thinks you could perhaps add more information about how low culture relates to class.

Structure:

The page is well structured; each facet of the topic leads into the other seamlessly.

Balance:

I do think that the article would greatly benefit with having some example of low culture and possibly a little more elaboration. Otherwise, everything about the article is on topic. Neutral:

The article and information all seem very unbiased. There are also no tone inconsistencies.

Resources:

The resources are quality resources; I do wonder if you could elaborate more on the topic or provide more sources that present in a more accessible way. I also find it interesting that there are only two sources on the article.