User talk:PussBroad

Hi PussBroad
Hello How are you? (Mudak568 (talk) 23:05, 31 December 2013 (UTC)) Mudak568 (talk) 23:05, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello PussBroad! Your additions to Information war during the Russo-Georgian War have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sennecaster ( Chat ) 02:48, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Project 2025
Hi, I notice that you removed "dismantling the FBI" "since not mentioned anywhere in the "Mandate for Leadership". The article is about Project 2025 and references material about the project found in secondary reliable sources. The scope of the article goes beyond coverage of the contents of the Mandate for Leadership, which is a primary source; and topics covered do not have to exist in the Mandate.  Esowteric +  Talk  +  Breadcrumbs   20:51, 9 June 2024 (UTC)


 * My concern about the article is not because of my support for Project 2025 but that its supporters may legitimately be able to claim that it is exaggerated. The question is how far should the scope of the article extend beyond the Mandate for Leadership. My understanding is that the intentions of Project 2025 are entirely defined by the Mandate for Leadership. If the creators of the Project have written anywhere else that they intend to dismantle the FBI then of course that may be cited, but the fact that a writer for the Guardian states that Project 2025 involves dismantling the FBI does not make the statement true and must not take precedence over the primary source - especially when the same article states that members of the Trump cult intend to turn the FBI into an instrument of revenge, which would seem to be at odds with dismantling it. PussBroad (talk) 14:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)