User talk:Pvae

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Pvae! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on or by typing helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Michael (talk) 09:12, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Songfacts
Please don't add links to Songfacts on Wikipedia. Songfacts relies on user-submitted information and is therefore not a reliable source. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 17:38, 15 April 2009 (UTC) I disagree, have you looked at the website properly? They have a lot of interviews with the songwriters about the songs and most entries are written by Songfacts writers. (You are probably misled by their entries for older songs like "Hotel California" that do have some contributions from users, which are clearly differenated from the Songfacts writer's contributions.) Look at current songs from 2008-2010, which are only written by Songfacts staff or borrow quotes from other reliable music websites. (For example "I Love College" by Asher Roth or "Bad Romance" by Lady Gaga ). Please look properly next time before telling me a website "relies on user-submitted information." Pvae (talk) 08:08, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * For the second time, please don't add Songfacts. It is not a reliable source. For more information on what makes a source reliable, look here. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:10, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * If a "fact" is attributed to another source that should be used directly and not Songfacts. Rehevkor ✉  19:18, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents
FYI.--Chaser (talk) 22:40, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Blacklisting discussion
You might be interested in this. I admit it will be a battle since it is on so many pages, but you might be able to help sway support for the thing in a favorable direction. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:18, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You're the subject of another ANI discussion: link. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 01:44, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
As this is the second time that you have been advised to stop adding links to a specific non-reliable external source, I have been forced to block you for one week. You might want to go back to the start and read these core policies, the importance of reliable sources, and the policy regarding external links. If you feel this block is unjust, you may read the guide to appealing blocks. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 09:36, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)