User talk:Pwestep

A tag has been placed on Longenity, Inc., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Chris cheese whine 23:58, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm writing here as a courtesy, to notify you that I've added a tag to the top of Preston Estep indicating that it is in large part autobiographical. This is in light of the fact that:

1) You created it.

2) There is substantial evidence that you have been maintaining it anonymously since its creation.

You are welcome to respond to my action on the talk page of the article, but as a matter of good faith and personal integrity, I ask that you please do not remove the autobiography tag from Preston Estep, or ask anyone else to do so on your behalf.

As I'm sure you are aware, it is strongly discouraged to edit the Wikipedia article about yourself, let alone create it. Most people would have their pages summarily deleted for doing so -- and I'm not proposing that here, since I'm convinced you're notable enough to justify it. I don't want to embarrass you, but that tag has been removed without discussion twice before, and if you're doing that, that's dishonest. This is a massive conflict of interest, and a violation of the spirit of Wikipedia.

As I wrote on the talk page, I understand that the tag is not the most glamorous thing to have on your Wikipedia article, but as a researcher that places value on good scholarship, I'm sure that you can appreciate the tremendous importance of permitting people to remain informed as to the source of their information.

Jonathansfox (talk) 12:12, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mini-death-front.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Mini-death-front.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 22:45, 17 December 2009 (UTC)