User talk:Pwilliams128

Notability of The Clemenza Foundation
A tag has been placed on The Clemenza Foundation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ♦Tangerines♦ · Talk 03:26, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Talk:Phillip Giaccone has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.  jj137  (talk)  16:24, 1 March 2008 (UTC) Sorry, that was an accident.  jj137  (talk)  16:26, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Re your message
The article is not eligible for speedy deletion because it is not blatant that it is attacking anyone, and the article asserts notability. if you believe the article should be deleted, I would suggest nominating it at WP:AFD (follow the instructions there) or I can nominate it for you if you give me the criteria by which it should be nominated. -- Roleplayer (talk) 16:40, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Done. See Articles for deletion/Phillip Giaccone. -- Roleplayer (talk) 16:56, 1 March 2008 (UTC)