User talk:Pworms

License tagging for Image:CooperWaxModel.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CooperWaxModel.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 19:07, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Can you register this photo, or get a permission to copy it? It is a good photo. Thank you for a decent article on breast anatomy. I wish you could help with "Breast implant" and of course, "Breast". There is a heated argument at "Breast implant", and nothing whatsoever about whether implants interfere with breastfeeding. I have only banged my head against the wall, and am sick of all of it. Jance 23:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Ramsay image
Regarding Image:Ramsey breastanat.jpg, the fair use claim is clearly false. Please see WP:FU. You also wrote that you have obtained permission from the copyright holder; what are the terms of the permission? If it allows redistribution and modification of the image (i. e. if it is functionally equivalent to the CC-BY-SA licence), the image is probably free enoguh to be used on Wikipedia. Otherwise, the image is unfortunately inappropriate (unless you can obtain such permission).

In any case, please state the terms of the permission on the image description page. —xyzzyn 16:57, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

P. S. You added a reference to the article that says ‘See Hartmann.’ but forgot to say to what Hartmann refers. I’ve commented out the tag for now (this stuff is very much not my department, so I can’t reasonably find it myself); please give a full citation. —xyzzyn 08:43, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Paupiette
I have nominated Paupiette, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Paupiette. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Rtphokie (talk) 20:07, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Pworms! Your additions to Gliricidia have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted.  All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI help 17:09, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

File:CooperWaxModel.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CooperWaxModel.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 18:52, 8 October 2023 (UTC)