User talk:Pxstar12

Your draft article, Draft:Cassidy Janson


Hello, Pxstar12. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cassidy Janson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Phospheros (talk) 18:54, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2020
Your recent bold edit has been reverted. Per the bold, revert, discuss cycle, after a bold edit is reverted, the status quo should remain while a discussion is started instead of edit-warring, and it should be resolved before reinstating the edit, after a needed consensus is formed to keep it.-- VViking Talk Edits 13:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.-- VViking Talk Edits 13:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

The updated BLP text is from Stefan Pejic's official website stefanpejic.com and he has personally requested that I update it.

You may wish to review COI
Hello, Pxstar12. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.-- VViking Talk Edits 13:57, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Check out the official biography for yourself at Stefan Pejic's website. It's public knowledge. The other Wikipedia info before this was incorrect and out-of-date. Stefan Pejic's Wikipedia page is now 100% correct. There is no advertising, publicising or promoting in the content. It is all true fact and correct. There is no conflict of interest in adding an already public, true and correct biography with no intent to advertise, publicise or promote. Wikipedia is supposed to be providing true and correct information which I have done. Anyone visiting Stefan's website can see this information and add it themselves. - User:Pxstar12

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. VViking Talk Edits 14:26, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright violation
Your addition to Stefan Pejic has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. -- VViking Talk Edits 17:45, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

So much wrong with your account and what you are doing, please read terms and conditions and WP policies
First even if, as you say, you have been given permission to enter the copyrighted material to Wikipedia we actually do not have evidence of permission from they copyright holder. Second you are continuing to be involved in an edit war. Removing clear copyright violations is one of the exemptions from the 3 revert rule. Finally at this time is the fact that you need to be Civil to other editors. When you stated on the edit warring notice board that "You have serious issues" that was not being civil and may lead to your editing privileges being removed.-- VViking Talk Edits 19:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.
 * If you make any further reverts on this article or copy unencyclopedic material from other websites (whether you have permission or not), you will be blocked indefinitely. Number   5  7  19:51, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

User:Viewmont Viking - Actually, there is so much wrong with your account and what you are doing. You are being very uncivil towards me. You don't even know any information about Stefan Pejic, you haven't even contributed any content and yet you have been harassing me all day. I have updated information with permission from the person who the page is about. There is no copyright infringement. The information is correct and up to date. You need to stop being disrespectful and contribute something positive.